Comparison Overview

Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc

VS

Richards Label Co, Inc.

Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc

711 North A Street, Fort Smith, AR, 72901, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

The biggest names in sports and entertainment trust Weldon, Williams and Lick (WW&L) to drive revenue and fan engagement through innovative ticketing, cutting-edge technologies, and custom, secure access control solutions. From the Olympics and Super Bowl to hundreds of professional and collegiate teams, tournaments and signature venues, the most sought-after events for the last 125 years have trusted WW&L as their valued partner. As the sports and entertainment landscape continues to evolve, WW&L is at the forefront in expanding its product offerings to create a more impactful experience: ➡️ Direct Souvenir provides professional and collegiate teams, along with event promoters, the ability to deliver an important new revenue stream and unique way to maximize fan engagement. ✔️ Bridging the gap between digital ticketing and printed tickets, WW&L has built a platform that encourages fans to purchase a souvenir ticket within the event buy flow. ✔️ For the diehard fans who attend every Opening Day or those that can’t believe they were there for a Perfect Game, Direct Souvenir ensures they can hold onto memories forever. ➡️ Through WW&L Tech, the company is able to offer a delivers a multitude of services through a single-source provider: ✔️ Specialty credentialing that utilizes RFID technology to better serve high-end guests, along with increased security and access control ✔️ Embedded QR codes to unlock unique digital experiences for fans and sponsors ✔️ Parking solutions that streamline ingress and egress via a point-of-sale (POS) application and cloud-based, real-time reporting suite

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 116
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Richards Label Co, Inc.

17291 Mount Herrmann, Fountain Valley, California, US, 92708
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Richards Label Company is your one-stop for printing solutions. While pressure sensitive labels are how we made our name in the industry, our commitment to expanding our capabilities has lead us to excellence in flexible packaging, tags, inserts, and a constantly expanding array of packaging innovations. Whether you are looking for upgraded packaging for your well-established product, or you are brand-new to the market and looking for a strong start, we can help you reach your goals. More than just a label vendor, Richards Label Company becomes a part of your team; working with you to find unique solutions and meet your company’s specific needs. Richards Label, Partnering in the success of your product since 1979.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/weldon-williams-&-lick.jpeg
Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/richards-label-co-inc-.jpeg
Richards Label Co, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Richards Label Co, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Richards Label Co, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Richards Label Co, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Richards Label Co, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/weldon-williams-&-lick.jpeg
Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/richards-label-co-inc-.jpeg
Richards Label Co, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Richards Label Co, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Richards Label Co, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc company.

In the current year, Richards Label Co, Inc. company and Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Richards Label Co, Inc. company nor Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Richards Label Co, Inc. company nor Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Richards Label Co, Inc. company nor Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc company nor Richards Label Co, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc nor Richards Label Co, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Richards Label Co, Inc. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc company.

Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc company employs more people globally than Richards Label Co, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc nor Richards Label Co, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc nor Richards Label Co, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc nor Richards Label Co, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc nor Richards Label Co, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc nor Richards Label Co, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Weldon, Williams & Lick, Inc nor Richards Label Co, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L