Comparison Overview

Weights & Biases

VS

IDEMIA

Weights & Biases

400 Alabama St, San Francisco, California, 94110, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://wandb.ai/site

Weights & Biases: the AI developer platform. Build better models faster, fine-tune LLMs, develop GenAI applications with confidence, all in one system of record developers are excited to use. W&B Models is the MLOps solution used by foundation model builders and enterprises who are training, fine-tuning, and deploying models into production. W&B Weave is the LLMOps solution for software developers who want a lightweight but powerful toolset to help them track and evaluate LLM applications. Weights & Biases is trusted by over a 1,000 companies to productionize AI at scale including teams at OpenAI, Meta, NVIDIA, Cohere, Toyota, Square, Salesforce, and Microsoft. Sign up for a 30-day free trial today at http://wandb.me/trial.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 299
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

IDEMIA

2 place Samuel Champlain, Courbevoie, 92400, FR
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
https://www.idemia.com/business/idemia-secure-transactions

IDEMIA Secure Transactions (IST) is a leading provider of payment, connectivity, and cybersecurity solutions, serving billions of people worldwide. With decades of expertise in cryptography and credential issuance, IST is trusted by over 2000 financial institutions, mobile operators, automotive manufacturers, and IoT providers worldwide. IST is a division of IDEMIA Group. IDEMIA Public Security, another division of IDEMIA Group, is the premium provider of convenient and trusted biometric-based solutions, transforming public and private organizations across the globe. Follow them here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/idemia-public-security/

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 12,635
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/weights-biases.jpeg
Weights & Biases
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/idemiagroup.jpeg
IDEMIA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Weights & Biases
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IDEMIA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Weights & Biases in 2026.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IDEMIA in 2026.

Incident History — Weights & Biases (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Weights & Biases cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IDEMIA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IDEMIA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/weights-biases.jpeg
Weights & Biases
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/idemiagroup.jpeg
IDEMIA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

IDEMIA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Weights & Biases company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, IDEMIA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Weights & Biases company.

In the current year, IDEMIA company and Weights & Biases company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IDEMIA company nor Weights & Biases company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IDEMIA company nor Weights & Biases company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IDEMIA company nor Weights & Biases company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Weights & Biases company nor IDEMIA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Weights & Biases nor IDEMIA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

IDEMIA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Weights & Biases company.

IDEMIA company employs more people globally than Weights & Biases company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Weights & Biases nor IDEMIA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Weights & Biases nor IDEMIA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Weights & Biases nor IDEMIA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Weights & Biases nor IDEMIA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Weights & Biases nor IDEMIA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Weights & Biases nor IDEMIA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References