Comparison Overview

Weatherford

VS

Suncor

Weatherford

undefined, Dublin, undefined, undefined, IE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.weatherford.com

Weatherford International plc (Nasdaq: WFRD) is a leading global energy services company. Operating in approximately 75 countries, the Company answers the challenges of the energy industry with its global talent network of approximately 17,000 team members and approximately 350 operating locations, including manufacturing, research and development, service, and training facilities.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 29,461
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Suncor

150 - 6 Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta, undefined, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 800 and 849
http://www.suncor.com

In 1967, we pioneered commercial development of Canada's oil sands – one of the largest petroleum resource basins in the world. Since then, Suncor has grown to become a globally competitive integrated energy company with a balanced portfolio of high-quality assets, a strong balance sheet and significant growth prospects. Suncor’s operations include oil sands development and upgrading, conventional and offshore oil and gas production, petroleum refining, and product marketing under the Petro-Canada brand. Our use of innovative technology has made us an industry leader in the energy business – and with a strong strategy for growth, Suncor offers a solid foundation for you to continue building your career. As an employer, Suncor is one of the best companies in Canada, providing tremendous future potential where talented people thrive and lead. As our business evolves, so do our employment opportunities. Our work culture includes a dynamic mix of newcomers and experienced professionals, with a diversity of skills and expertise from all parts of Canada.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 14,321
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/weatherford.jpeg
Weatherford
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suncor.jpeg
Suncor
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Weatherford
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Suncor
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Weatherford in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Suncor in 2025.

Incident History — Weatherford (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Weatherford cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Suncor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Suncor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/weatherford.jpeg
Weatherford
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suncor.jpeg
Suncor
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Suncor company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Weatherford company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Suncor company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Weatherford company has not reported any.

In the current year, Suncor company and Weatherford company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Suncor company nor Weatherford company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Suncor company nor Weatherford company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Suncor company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Weatherford company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Weatherford company nor Suncor company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Weatherford nor Suncor holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Weatherford company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Suncor company.

Weatherford company employs more people globally than Suncor company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither Weatherford nor Suncor holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Weatherford nor Suncor holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Weatherford nor Suncor holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Weatherford nor Suncor holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Weatherford nor Suncor holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Weatherford nor Suncor holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References