Comparison Overview

Weatherall Printing

VS

Meyers

Weatherall Printing

1349 Cliff Gookin Blvd, Tupelo, Mississippi, US, 38801
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Weatherall Printing Co. was established in Tupelo, Mississippi in 1924 as an office supply and stationers store. In 1957 the office supply portion of the business was sold and since then Weatherall Printing has matured, developed and earned a reputation for quality, creativity and reliability in offset printing. We moved into our current facility in July 1983, expanded in 1994 and again in 2004. In addition to offset printing, we now offer digital printing, online storefronts and multi-channel marketing solutions to help you deliver your message to your customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Meyers

7277 Boone Ave North, Minneapolis, MN, 55428, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Discover a partner who makes it easy to achieve your sustainability, packaging, and merchandising goals - Meyers. We create sustainable packaging, labels, and retail displays to introduce people to new experiences and products that they'll love. Our team is comprised of hard-working and caring problem solvers who enable innovative brand leaders. Join us to create a sustainable future for people, products, and the planet. We are also committed to environmental compliance and are a proud supporter of the Sustainable Green Printing Partnership, (SGP) the Forest Stewardship Council, (FSC), and the Sustainable Forestry Initiative. (SFI)

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 231
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/weatherall-printing.jpeg
Weatherall Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meyers.jpeg
Meyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Weatherall Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Meyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Weatherall Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Meyers in 2025.

Incident History — Weatherall Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Weatherall Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Meyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/weatherall-printing.jpeg
Weatherall Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meyers.jpeg
Meyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Weatherall Printing company and Meyers company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Meyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Weatherall Printing company.

In the current year, Meyers company and Weatherall Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Meyers company nor Weatherall Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Meyers company nor Weatherall Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Meyers company nor Weatherall Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Weatherall Printing company nor Meyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Weatherall Printing nor Meyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Meyers company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Weatherall Printing company.

Meyers company employs more people globally than Weatherall Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Weatherall Printing nor Meyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Weatherall Printing nor Meyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Weatherall Printing nor Meyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Weatherall Printing nor Meyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Weatherall Printing nor Meyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Weatherall Printing nor Meyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N