Comparison Overview

WearTesters

VS

Mediahuis Nederland

WearTesters

541 S Orlando Ave, Maitland, Florida, 32751, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

WearTesters is the world's #1 sneaker review website. We publish comprehensive and unbiased footwear, apparel, and sporting goods reviews. Our veteran team of WearTesters uses a detailed review and testing process designed to provide recommendations and insights to help readers determine the best shoes and apparel for them. Our primary goal is to help our readers save time and money while finding the best possible products.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mediahuis Nederland

Basisweg 30, Amsterdam, 1043 AP, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Mediahuis is één van de grootste Nederlandse mediabedrijven met sterke merken als De Telegraaf, VROUW, Privé, Autovisie; regionale dagbladen (Noordhollands Dagblad, Haarlems Dagblad, Leidsch Dagblad, IJmuider Courant en De Gooi- en Eemlander) en digitale merken zoals Dumpert, Culy, NSMBL, J/M Ouders, Jaap, Metro en GroupDeal. Mediahuis gelooft in onafhankelijke journalistiek en sterke en relevante media. De relatie met de klant staat centraal staat bij iedere strategische keuze. Voor adverteerders is Mediahuis een creatief en strategisch partner; met totaaloplossingen waarbij strategie, creatie, data en bereik worden gecombineerd. Het content marketing bureau van Mediahuis, Wayne Parker Kent, helpt merken om hun marketingdoelstellingen te behalen door middel van contentoplossingen. Ga voor meer informatie over Mediahuis naar www.mediahuis.nl.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1,336
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/weartesters.jpeg
WearTesters
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mediahuisnederland.jpeg
Mediahuis Nederland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
WearTesters
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mediahuis Nederland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WearTesters in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mediahuis Nederland in 2025.

Incident History — WearTesters (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WearTesters cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mediahuis Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mediahuis Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/weartesters.jpeg
WearTesters
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mediahuisnederland.jpeg
Mediahuis Nederland
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mediahuis Nederland company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to WearTesters company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mediahuis Nederland company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to WearTesters company.

In the current year, Mediahuis Nederland company and WearTesters company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mediahuis Nederland company nor WearTesters company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mediahuis Nederland company nor WearTesters company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mediahuis Nederland company nor WearTesters company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither WearTesters company nor Mediahuis Nederland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither WearTesters nor Mediahuis Nederland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither WearTesters company nor Mediahuis Nederland company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mediahuis Nederland company employs more people globally than WearTesters company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither WearTesters nor Mediahuis Nederland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither WearTesters nor Mediahuis Nederland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither WearTesters nor Mediahuis Nederland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither WearTesters nor Mediahuis Nederland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither WearTesters nor Mediahuis Nederland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither WearTesters nor Mediahuis Nederland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.