Comparison Overview

We Do Graphics, Inc.

VS

FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center)

We Do Graphics, Inc.

1150 N. Main St., Orange, CA, 92867, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

We Do Graphics, Inc. provides convenient custom printing solutions for all business or personal printing needs. Our specialties include but are not limited to: Presentation Folders, Marketing Materials, Direct Mailers, Brochures, and more. We can help you get to where ever your imagination wants to take you! Call us for your next print project and experience our world class customer service.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center)

611 Fabrication St, Dallas, Texas, 75212-5424, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Finishing & Mailing Center, LLC offers a full service Direct Mail approach providing everything from Postcards and Self-Mailers to First-Class Billing and Standard Mail Inserted Envelopes and Freight-Shipped Kitted Parcels. After spending millions of dollars purchasing printing for our customers, we decided to take a leap and purchase some of our own equipment. We now own a state-of-the-art direct to plate prepress system and 2 wonderful 5 color Heidelberg presses. It’s great to be able to get more aggressive on pricing or to be able to turn a new job at a moments notice because we control our own schedule. Beyond that, however, our business has grown such that we still purchase millions of dollars worth of printing (go figure...). Because of that volume and lots of other capabilities our plant offers to other printers, we have a great relationship with some of the largest printers in the country. If we can’t print it in-house because it doesn’t match well with our press, we know who has the best press for the job and can negotiate you discounted rates that you would not be able to get on your own. What this means for you is that no matter how large your job happens to be – we can handle it!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/we-do-graphics-inc..jpeg
We Do Graphics, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/finishing-and-mailing-center-llc.jpeg
FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
We Do Graphics, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for We Do Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center) in 2025.

Incident History — We Do Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

We Do Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/we-do-graphics-inc..jpeg
We Do Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/finishing-and-mailing-center-llc.jpeg
FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

We Do Graphics, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to We Do Graphics, Inc. company.

In the current year, FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center) company and We Do Graphics, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center) company nor We Do Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center) company nor We Do Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center) company nor We Do Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither We Do Graphics, Inc. company nor FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither We Do Graphics, Inc. nor FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither We Do Graphics, Inc. company nor FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center) company employs more people globally than We Do Graphics, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither We Do Graphics, Inc. nor FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither We Do Graphics, Inc. nor FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither We Do Graphics, Inc. nor FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither We Do Graphics, Inc. nor FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither We Do Graphics, Inc. nor FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither We Do Graphics, Inc. nor FMC Printing (Formerly Finishing & Mailing Center) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N