Comparison Overview

We Are Fruition

VS

Lola Visual Effects

We Are Fruition

23 Austin Friars, London, England, EC2N 2QP, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799

In our ever-changing industry of advertising we take pride in being a highly-skilled, industrious and proactive production company. We can accommodate a variety of briefs specific to the expertise of our directors; this includes live action, experiential content, and 2D and 3D animation production services. We offer a bespoke roster of top ranking directors, allowing our company to cater for a broad spectrum of high quality content. Fruition offers extensive opportunities to clients with full-service production on all jobs, from conception to completion. Our award winning Directors have created work of the highest calibre for brands including Nike, HBO, Mercedes, Playstation, Adidas, BBC and Huawei. Managing Director Phoebe Scott has produced global advertising campaigns for clients such as Nike, Huawei, Skoda, Pampers and Hugo Boss.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lola Visual Effects

10435 Santa Monica Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, US
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799

Lola VFX is an award winning visual effects company that specializes in altering an actors'​ on screen appearances to service story and character. With innovative visual effects, such as, transforming Chris Evans into a 90-pound weakling for CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE FIRST AVENGER, twinning Armie Hammer as Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss in THE SOCIAL NETWORK, "youthifying"​ Brad Pitt in THE CURIOUS CASE OF BENJAMIN BUTTON, advancing age in HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS. Our founding partner and visual effects supervisor, Edson Williams, has won a BAFTA for the work completed on Benjamin Button and has been nominated for an Oscan for "The Lone Ranger"​. Our compositors have won "Outstanding Compositing in a Feature Motion Picture"​ for Captain America: The First Avenger (2011).

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/we-are-fruition.jpeg
We Are Fruition
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lola-visual-effects.jpeg
Lola Visual Effects
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
We Are Fruition
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lola Visual Effects
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for We Are Fruition in 2025.

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lola Visual Effects in 2025.

Incident History — We Are Fruition (X = Date, Y = Severity)

We Are Fruition cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lola Visual Effects (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lola Visual Effects cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/we-are-fruition.jpeg
We Are Fruition
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lola-visual-effects.jpeg
Lola Visual Effects
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

We Are Fruition company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lola Visual Effects company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lola Visual Effects company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to We Are Fruition company.

In the current year, Lola Visual Effects company and We Are Fruition company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lola Visual Effects company nor We Are Fruition company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lola Visual Effects company nor We Are Fruition company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lola Visual Effects company nor We Are Fruition company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither We Are Fruition company nor Lola Visual Effects company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither We Are Fruition nor Lola Visual Effects holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither We Are Fruition company nor Lola Visual Effects company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lola Visual Effects company employs more people globally than We Are Fruition company, reflecting its scale as a Movies, Videos, and Sound.

Neither We Are Fruition nor Lola Visual Effects holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither We Are Fruition nor Lola Visual Effects holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither We Are Fruition nor Lola Visual Effects holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither We Are Fruition nor Lola Visual Effects holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither We Are Fruition nor Lola Visual Effects holds HIPAA certification.

Neither We Are Fruition nor Lola Visual Effects holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N