Comparison Overview

Wayfair

VS

Advance Auto Parts

Wayfair

4 Copley Place - Floor 7, Boston, MA, 02116, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20

Wayfair is the destination for all things home: helping everyone, anywhere create their feeling of home. From expert customer service, to the development of tools that make the shopping process easier, to carrying one of the widest and deepest selections of items for every space, style, and budget, Wayfair gives everyone the power to create spaces that are just right for them.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 12,115
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Advance Auto Parts

2635 E. Millbrook Road, None, Raleigh, NC, US, 27604
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Advance Auto Parts, Inc. is a leading automotive aftermarket parts provider that serves both professional installers and do-it-yourself customers. As of October 5, 2024, Advance operated 4,781 stores primarily within the United States, with additional locations in Canada, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The company also served 1,125 independently owned Carquest branded stores across these locations in addition to Mexico and various Caribbean islands. Additional information about Advance, including employment opportunities, customer services and online shopping for parts, accessories and other offerings can be found at www.AdvanceAutoParts.com.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 23,529
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wayfair.jpeg
Wayfair
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advance-auto-parts.jpeg
Advance Auto Parts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wayfair
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Advance Auto Parts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wayfair in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Advance Auto Parts in 2025.

Incident History — Wayfair (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wayfair cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Advance Auto Parts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Advance Auto Parts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wayfair.jpeg
Wayfair
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advance-auto-parts.jpeg
Advance Auto Parts
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2015
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Wayfair company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Advance Auto Parts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Advance Auto Parts company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Wayfair company has not reported any.

In the current year, Advance Auto Parts company and Wayfair company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Advance Auto Parts company nor Wayfair company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Advance Auto Parts company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Wayfair company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Advance Auto Parts company nor Wayfair company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wayfair company nor Advance Auto Parts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wayfair nor Advance Auto Parts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Advance Auto Parts company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Wayfair company.

Advance Auto Parts company employs more people globally than Wayfair company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Wayfair nor Advance Auto Parts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wayfair nor Advance Auto Parts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wayfair nor Advance Auto Parts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wayfair nor Advance Auto Parts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wayfair nor Advance Auto Parts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wayfair nor Advance Auto Parts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H