Comparison Overview

Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf

VS

Maine Maritime Museum

Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf

94133, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.waxmuseum.com

The Wax Museum in the heart of San Francisco's Fisherman's Wharf is home to over 250 internationally known personalities. A millennium of history is represented in fabulous scenes from the birth of Christ through the most dramatic milestones in man's history. As one of the world's largest wax museums, this San Francisco attraction endeavors to show life in all its aspects from A to Z - Artists to Zombies! Guests are inspired by the Last Supper in the Hall of Religions and Horrified by the chilling Chamber of Horrors. Our venue offers the worlds only wax tableaux of King Tut's Magnificent Tomb and the Palace of Living Arts, where history's most famous masters, as well as their masterpieces, come to life. As always, the incumbent President occupies his rightful place among the World Leaders, a few steps away from his illustrious Predecessors in the Presidential Library.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Maine Maritime Museum

243 Washington St, Bath, Maine 04530-1638, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mainemaritimemuseum.org

Maine Maritime Museum connects the community and a worldwide audience to the past, present and future of Maine's waterways and Maine's important role in regional and global maritime activities. The Museum accomplishes its stewardship through: discriminate collection, preservation and dissemination of historic materials and information, engaging educational programs, relevant and compelling exhibitions, and a unique historic shipyard, all connecting the past to contemporary and future issues.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maine-maritime-museum.jpeg
Maine Maritime Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Maine Maritime Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maine Maritime Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Maine Maritime Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maine Maritime Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maine-maritime-museum.jpeg
Maine Maritime Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Maine Maritime Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Maine Maritime Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company.

In the current year, Maine Maritime Museum company and Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Maine Maritime Museum company nor Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Maine Maritime Museum company nor Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Maine Maritime Museum company nor Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company nor Maine Maritime Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Maine Maritime Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company nor Maine Maritime Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Maine Maritime Museum company employs more people globally than Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Maine Maritime Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Maine Maritime Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Maine Maritime Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Maine Maritime Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Maine Maritime Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Maine Maritime Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References