Comparison Overview

Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf

VS

Florida Museum of Photographic Arts

Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf

94133, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 800 and 849

The Wax Museum in the heart of San Francisco's Fisherman's Wharf is home to over 250 internationally known personalities. A millennium of history is represented in fabulous scenes from the birth of Christ through the most dramatic milestones in man's history. As one of the world's largest wax museums, this San Francisco attraction endeavors to show life in all its aspects from A to Z - Artists to Zombies! Guests are inspired by the Last Supper in the Hall of Religions and Horrified by the chilling Chamber of Horrors. Our venue offers the worlds only wax tableaux of King Tut's Magnificent Tomb and the Palace of Living Arts, where history's most famous masters, as well as their masterpieces, come to life. As always, the incumbent President occupies his rightful place among the World Leaders, a few steps away from his illustrious Predecessors in the Presidential Library.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Florida Museum of Photographic Arts

1630 E. 7th Avenue, Tampa, 33605, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Florida Museum of Photographic Arts is a museum dedicated to exhibiting important photographic arts as central to contemporary life and culture. The museum collects, reserves and exhibits historic and contemporary works by nationally and internationally important photographic artists. It also enriches the community by operating outreach programs to educate children and adults. Check out our Photography Classes in Tampa!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-museum-of-photographic-arts.jpeg
Florida Museum of Photographic Arts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Florida Museum of Photographic Arts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Florida Museum of Photographic Arts in 2025.

Incident History — Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Florida Museum of Photographic Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Florida Museum of Photographic Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-museum-of-photographic-arts.jpeg
Florida Museum of Photographic Arts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company.

In the current year, Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company and Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company nor Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company nor Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company nor Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company employs more people globally than Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X