Comparison Overview

Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf

VS

Liverpool Powerhouse

Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf

94133, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.waxmuseum.com

The Wax Museum in the heart of San Francisco's Fisherman's Wharf is home to over 250 internationally known personalities. A millennium of history is represented in fabulous scenes from the birth of Christ through the most dramatic milestones in man's history. As one of the world's largest wax museums, this San Francisco attraction endeavors to show life in all its aspects from A to Z - Artists to Zombies! Guests are inspired by the Last Supper in the Hall of Religions and Horrified by the chilling Chamber of Horrors. Our venue offers the worlds only wax tableaux of King Tut's Magnificent Tomb and the Palace of Living Arts, where history's most famous masters, as well as their masterpieces, come to life. As always, the incumbent President occupies his rightful place among the World Leaders, a few steps away from his illustrious Predecessors in the Presidential Library.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Liverpool Powerhouse

1 Powerhouse Rd, Casula, New South Wales, AU, 2170
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
https://www.liverpoolpowerhouse.com.au

We would like to acknowledge the Cabrogal Clan of the Darug Nation who are the traditional custodians of the land that now resides within Liverpool City Council’s boundaries. We acknowledge that this land was also accessed by peoples of the Dhurawal and Darug Nations. Casula Powerhouse Arts Centre is a re-purposed power station on the banks of the Georges River in Sydney’s South West. Almost entirely funded by Liverpool City Council, the Centre is celebrating its 25th anniversary in 2019 with a busy schedule of exhibitions, workshops, theatre, music, food and more. For 25 years the Centre has been the primary cultural institution in the region with 6 galleries, 2 theatres, a restaurant and over 20 hectares of parkland to explore. As an arts centre in South West Sydney, our primary audience is our local community. This philosophy extends to our restaurant Bellbird Dining & Bar, which uses locally-sourced, sustainable produce. 

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/casula-powerhouse-arts-centre.jpeg
Liverpool Powerhouse
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Liverpool Powerhouse
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Liverpool Powerhouse in 2026.

Incident History — Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Liverpool Powerhouse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Liverpool Powerhouse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/casula-powerhouse-arts-centre.jpeg
Liverpool Powerhouse
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Liverpool Powerhouse company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Liverpool Powerhouse company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company.

In the current year, Liverpool Powerhouse company and Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Liverpool Powerhouse company nor Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Liverpool Powerhouse company nor Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Liverpool Powerhouse company nor Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company nor Liverpool Powerhouse company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Liverpool Powerhouse holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company nor Liverpool Powerhouse company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Liverpool Powerhouse company employs more people globally than Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Liverpool Powerhouse holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Liverpool Powerhouse holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Liverpool Powerhouse holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Liverpool Powerhouse holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Liverpool Powerhouse holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wax Museum at Fisherman's Wharf nor Liverpool Powerhouse holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References