Comparison Overview

Watson Label Products

VS

Impact Printing (Hayward)

Watson Label Products

10616 Trenton Ave, Saint Louis, Missouri 63132-1209, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.wlp.com

Watson Label Products specializes in manufacturing custom bar code labels for library, industrial and critical label applications. We offer flexibility, customization and personalization along with over 60 years of industry knowledge and expertise. We are an ISO Quality Certified Company and utilize a Post Production Computerized Inspection and Validation System. The quality of our products is outstanding and our customer service is second to none.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Impact Printing (Hayward)

None
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799
http://www.impactprint.com

For over twenty-five years, Impact Printing, a trade only company, has served the printing industry. Our focus is to build long-term relationships based on our commitment to excellent customer service. Our superb quality, experience, and service will deliver the exceptional impressions your customer requires. We take pride in offering a variety of products. From traditional offset printing to digital printing with variable data, we can fulfill your every need. Our entire staff will be happy to provide the time and assistance you require to ensure your printing needs are met in every way. You will find them professional, knowledgeable, efficient, and above all, dedicated to meeting your every need. We look forward to the opportunity to let our incomparable service make an impact on you

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/watson-label-products.jpeg
Watson Label Products
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impact-printing-hayward-.jpeg
Impact Printing (Hayward)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Watson Label Products
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Impact Printing (Hayward)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Watson Label Products in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Impact Printing (Hayward) in 2025.

Incident History — Watson Label Products (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Watson Label Products cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Impact Printing (Hayward) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Impact Printing (Hayward) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/watson-label-products.jpeg
Watson Label Products
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impact-printing-hayward-.jpeg
Impact Printing (Hayward)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Impact Printing (Hayward) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Watson Label Products company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Impact Printing (Hayward) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Watson Label Products company.

In the current year, Impact Printing (Hayward) company and Watson Label Products company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Impact Printing (Hayward) company nor Watson Label Products company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Impact Printing (Hayward) company nor Watson Label Products company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Impact Printing (Hayward) company nor Watson Label Products company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Watson Label Products company nor Impact Printing (Hayward) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Watson Label Products nor Impact Printing (Hayward) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Watson Label Products company nor Impact Printing (Hayward) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Watson Label Products company employs more people globally than Impact Printing (Hayward) company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Watson Label Products nor Impact Printing (Hayward) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Watson Label Products nor Impact Printing (Hayward) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Watson Label Products nor Impact Printing (Hayward) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Watson Label Products nor Impact Printing (Hayward) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Watson Label Products nor Impact Printing (Hayward) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Watson Label Products nor Impact Printing (Hayward) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References