Comparison Overview

Watson & Associates, LLC

VS

Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.

Watson & Associates, LLC

10200 E Girard Ave, Denver, Colorado, 80231, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Government contracts law firm with experienced federal procurement lawyers to maximize DOD contractors'​ experience in the federal procurement market . Our attorneys litigate small business issues such as bid protests, SBA size protests, government contract claims and appeals, SBA 8a certification and international procurement matters. We also litigate adverse actions such terminations for default and Contract Disputes Act appeals. We appear before various forums such as ASBC, CBCA, SBA OHA, the United States Court of Federal Claims and the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.

Three First National Plaza, 70 West Madison Street Suite 4000, Chicago, IL, US, 60602
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

HSPRD is a full-service law firm built on strong client relationships and supported by smart, skilled attorneys. We strive to provide the highest level of service to our clients and are nationally recognized for our litigation successes. We have a deep transactional practice and boast one of the strongest immigration groups in the country.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/watson-&-associates-llc.jpeg
Watson & Associates, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hughes-socol-piers-resnick-&-dym-ltd..jpeg
Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Watson & Associates, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Watson & Associates, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. in 2025.

Incident History — Watson & Associates, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Watson & Associates, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/watson-&-associates-llc.jpeg
Watson & Associates, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hughes-socol-piers-resnick-&-dym-ltd..jpeg
Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Watson & Associates, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Watson & Associates, LLC company has not reported any.

In the current year, Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. company and Watson & Associates, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. company nor Watson & Associates, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Watson & Associates, LLC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. company nor Watson & Associates, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Watson & Associates, LLC company nor Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Watson & Associates, LLC nor Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Watson & Associates, LLC company nor Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. company employs more people globally than Watson & Associates, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Watson & Associates, LLC nor Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Watson & Associates, LLC nor Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Watson & Associates, LLC nor Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Watson & Associates, LLC nor Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Watson & Associates, LLC nor Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Watson & Associates, LLC nor Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X