Comparison Overview

Washingtonian Magazine

VS

Lucinda Literary

Washingtonian Magazine

1828 L Street NW, Washington, D.C., undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Washingtonian, the magazine Washington lives by, is the region’s top source of information for dining, shopping, entertainment, and personalities. It has been Washington’s most trusted guide to living, working, and playing in the area for more than four decades thanks to features like “100 Very Best Restaurants,” “Top Doctors,” and “Great Places to Live.” The print magazine is read each month by more than 400,000 people, who spend an average of 96 minutes with each issue and save each issue for an average of five months. Washingtonian.com reaches more than a million unique readers every month. Washingtonian is a five-time National Magazine Award winner for its reporting and writing.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 78
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lucinda Literary

135 E. 57th St., New York, New York, 10022, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Lucinda Literary is a literary management firm representing bestselling, award-winning authors since 2011. Our strong background in marketing, commitment to editorial development, and broad media and film relationships enable us to be strategists and advocates not just for the books, but for the long-term careers of our authors. Lucinda Literary specializes in big idea, popular science, and narrative nonfiction books that look to change the way people work, behave, and live. We selectively represent fiction, and are always on the lookout for voice-driven, emotionally raw, and often unconventionally told novels for adults and young adults. In children’s books, we’re excited by stories that transport us and break new ground. Our Speaker's Bureau: Lucinda Literary’s Speakers Bureau was founded in 2016 to offer lecture opportunities and relationships to all Lucinda Literary authors, along with a select list of authors represented by colleagues. We’re also on a mission to demystify, educate, and lend impact to the industry through our workshops and courses for writers. We believe that every voice deserves a chance to be heard, and we want to help best position writers to have those opportunities by working hand-in-hand to draw out their best, most timely ideas; craft stellar queries; and polish and perfect their proposal or manuscript.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washingtonian-magazine.jpeg
Washingtonian Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lucinda-literary.jpeg
Lucinda Literary
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Washingtonian Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lucinda Literary
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Washingtonian Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lucinda Literary in 2025.

Incident History — Washingtonian Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Washingtonian Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lucinda Literary (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lucinda Literary cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washingtonian-magazine.jpeg
Washingtonian Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lucinda-literary.jpeg
Lucinda Literary
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Washingtonian Magazine company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lucinda Literary company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lucinda Literary company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Washingtonian Magazine company.

In the current year, Lucinda Literary company and Washingtonian Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lucinda Literary company nor Washingtonian Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lucinda Literary company nor Washingtonian Magazine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lucinda Literary company nor Washingtonian Magazine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Washingtonian Magazine company nor Lucinda Literary company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Washingtonian Magazine nor Lucinda Literary holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Washingtonian Magazine company nor Lucinda Literary company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Washingtonian Magazine company employs more people globally than Lucinda Literary company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Washingtonian Magazine nor Lucinda Literary holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Washingtonian Magazine nor Lucinda Literary holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Washingtonian Magazine nor Lucinda Literary holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Washingtonian Magazine nor Lucinda Literary holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Washingtonian Magazine nor Lucinda Literary holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Washingtonian Magazine nor Lucinda Literary holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.