Comparison Overview

Washington State University

VS

University of Delaware

Washington State University

Pullman/Spokane/Tri-Cities/Vancouver/Everett/Global, Pullman/Spokane/Tri-Cities/Vancouver/Everett/Global, Washington, 99164, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Washington State University is a nationally recognized land-grant research university, founded in Pullman in 1890. WSU’s statewide system includes campuses in Pullman, Spokane, Everett, Tri-Cities and Vancouver, with extension and research offices in every county of the state, and a nationally ranked online program. WSU is well known for its programs in veterinary medicine, agriculture, engineering, architecture, global animal health, food science, plant science, business, human health, pharmacy, neuroscience, communications, biofuels, sleep, business, education, energy. And, WSU athletics teams compete in the NCAA’s Pac-12 Conference.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,227
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

University of Delaware

104 Hullihen Hall, Newark, DE, US, 19716
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The University of Delaware - a state assisted, privately chartered institution - is a Land Grant, Sea Grant, Space Grant and Carnegie Research University (very high research activity). The University, with origins in 1743, was chartered by the State of Delaware in 1833. A Women's College was opened in 1914, and in 1945 UD became permanently coeducational. The main campus is located in Newark, Delaware, a suburban community of nearly 30,000, situated midway between Philadelphia and Baltimore. Courses are also offered at the Wilmington campus and at other locations throughout the State, including Dover, Georgetown, Milford, and Lewes.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,374
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-state-university.jpeg
Washington State University
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-delaware.jpeg
University of Delaware
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Washington State University
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Delaware
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Washington State University in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Delaware in 2026.

Incident History — Washington State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Washington State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Delaware (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Delaware cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-state-university.jpeg
Washington State University
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-delaware.jpeg
University of Delaware
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Washington State University company and University of Delaware company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, University of Delaware company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Washington State University company.

In the current year, University of Delaware company and Washington State University company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Delaware company nor Washington State University company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither University of Delaware company nor Washington State University company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither University of Delaware company nor Washington State University company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Washington State University company nor University of Delaware company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Washington State University nor University of Delaware holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Delaware company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Washington State University company.

University of Delaware company employs more people globally than Washington State University company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Washington State University nor University of Delaware holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Washington State University nor University of Delaware holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Washington State University nor University of Delaware holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Washington State University nor University of Delaware holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Washington State University nor University of Delaware holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Washington State University nor University of Delaware holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H