Comparison Overview

Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO

VS

Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA)

Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO

undefined, undefined, undefined, 98501, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://wslc.org

The Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO (WSLC) represents more than 600 local unions affiliated with the WSLC and more than half a million rank-and-file union members working in our state. The WSLC is the largest labor organization in our state and is the only organization representing all AFL-CIO unions in the state.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA)

55 York St., Toronto, Ontario, M5J1R7, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
https://cutaactu.ca

For more than 100 years, we’ve been the voice for public transit—so it can keep our communities moving safely and sustainably. Every day, millions of Canadians depend on public transit to get where they need to go. And while that may seem simple enough, public transit relies on technology, innovation, and investment to keep our communities moving safely and efficiently. It also relies on us. To communicate with governments—and within the sector. Depuis plus de 100 ans, nous jouons le rôle de porte-parole du transport collectif, afin que les membres de nos collectivités puissent continuer de se déplacer de façon sécuritaire et durable. Chaque jour, des millions de Canadiens dépendent du transport collectif pour se rendre où ils doivent aller. Bien que cela puisse sembler assez simple, le transport collectif est tributaire de la technologie, de l’innovation et de l’investissement pour assurer le transport sécuritaire et efficace des membres de nos collectivités. Il dépend également de nous. Pour communiquer avec les gouvernements et au sein du secteur.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-state-labor-council.jpeg
Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canadian-urban-transit-association.jpeg
Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) in 2025.

Incident History — Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-state-labor-council.jpeg
Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canadian-urban-transit-association.jpeg
Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO company.

In the current year, Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) company and Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) company nor Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) company nor Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) company nor Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO company nor Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO nor Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) company.

Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) company employs more people globally than Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO nor Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO nor Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO nor Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO nor Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO nor Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO nor Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References