Comparison Overview

Washington Legal Foundation

VS

fp21

Washington Legal Foundation

2009 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Washington, DC, 20036, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Washington Legal Foundation is America’s premier public interest law and policy center. WLF preserves and defends the nation’s free enterprise system by advocating for free markets, a limited and accountable government, individual and business civil liberties, and the rule of law. For more than 40 years WLF has successfully advanced these principles through a unique three-pronged strategy of original and amicus litigation; publications offering single-issue advocacy in eight distinct formats; and direct communications outreach through webcast programs, timely blogging, and other mechanisms.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

fp21

10 zoom ln, Washington, DC, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

fp21 is a non profit non partisan think tank dedicated to transforming the processes and institutions of U.S. foreign policy. We envision a new culture of foreign policy that uses data, robust analysis, and evidence in decision making processes, learns from successes and failures, and actively feed lessons back into the way they recruit, train, and promote a diverse and merit-based staff. fp21's work entails researching, designing, and advocating for pragmatic and evidence-based solutions at each stage of the policy process.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fp21org.jpeg
fp21
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Washington Legal Foundation
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
fp21
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Washington Legal Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for fp21 in 2025.

Incident History — Washington Legal Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Washington Legal Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — fp21 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

fp21 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-legal-foundation.jpeg
Washington Legal Foundation
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fp21org.jpeg
fp21
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Washington Legal Foundation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to fp21 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, fp21 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Washington Legal Foundation company.

In the current year, fp21 company and Washington Legal Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither fp21 company nor Washington Legal Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither fp21 company nor Washington Legal Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither fp21 company nor Washington Legal Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Washington Legal Foundation company nor fp21 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Washington Legal Foundation nor fp21 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Washington Legal Foundation company nor fp21 company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Washington Legal Foundation company employs more people globally than fp21 company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Washington Legal Foundation nor fp21 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Washington Legal Foundation nor fp21 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Washington Legal Foundation nor fp21 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Washington Legal Foundation nor fp21 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Washington Legal Foundation nor fp21 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Washington Legal Foundation nor fp21 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X