Comparison Overview

Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council

VS

Judicial Watch

Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council

Washington, DC, 20003, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.washingtonheadsofoffice.org/

The Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council (WHOOLC) provides leadership development and networking opportunities that inspire strategic visioning, inform programmatic planning, and improve relationship-building for members. By curating and delivering leadership development and networking opportunities that create, support, and advances diversity in the government affairs industry, WHOOLC’s mission is to create a more inclusive workforce where qualifications are measured by merit alone.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Judicial Watch

425 Third St SW, Washington, DC, 20024, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799
http://www.judicialwatch.org

Judicial Watch, Inc., a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law. Through our educational endeavors, we advocate high standards of ethics and morality in our nation's public life and seek to ensure that political and judicial officials do not abuse the powers entrusted to them by the American people. Our motto is "Because no one is above the law"​. To this end, we use open records and freedom of information laws and other tools to investigate and uncover misconduct by government officials and litigation to hold to account politicians and public officials who engage in corrupt activities. Litigation and the civil discovery process not only uncover information for the education of the American people on anti-corruption issues, but can also provide a basis for civil authorities to criminally prosecute corrupt officials. We seek to ensure high ethical standards in the judiciary through monitoring activities and the use of the judicial ethics process to hold judges to account. Through its Open Records Project, Judicial Watch also provides training and legal services to other conservatives concerning how to effectively use the Freedom of Information Act and other open records laws to achieve conservative goals of accountability and openness in government.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-heads-of-office.jpeg
Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/judicial-watch.jpeg
Judicial Watch
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Judicial Watch
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Judicial Watch in 2025.

Incident History — Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Judicial Watch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Judicial Watch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-heads-of-office.jpeg
Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/judicial-watch.jpeg
Judicial Watch
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Judicial Watch company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Judicial Watch company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council company.

In the current year, Judicial Watch company and Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Judicial Watch company nor Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Judicial Watch company nor Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Judicial Watch company nor Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council company nor Judicial Watch company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council nor Judicial Watch holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council company nor Judicial Watch company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Judicial Watch company employs more people globally than Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council nor Judicial Watch holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council nor Judicial Watch holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council nor Judicial Watch holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council nor Judicial Watch holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council nor Judicial Watch holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Washington Heads of Office Leadership Council nor Judicial Watch holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References