Comparison Overview

Warrigal

VS

Tennessee Medical Foundation

Warrigal

2 Pine Street, Albion Park Rail, NSW, 2527, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Subscribe to our 🗞️ here: www.warrigal.com.au/subscribe Our vision: A world where older people feel known, loved, and connected. With nearly six decades of experience as an award-winning, not-for-profit aged care organisation, we are proud to serve the Illawarra, Southern Highlands, Queanbeyan, and Canberra regions. Our mission is to ensure that every older person can be independent, respected, happy, and connected. We offer a diverse range of community villages and aged care services tailored to the unique experiences and desires of each individual we support. People are at the heart of everything we do - our residents, clients, staff, and volunteers. We recognise and celebrate the uniqueness of every person and are dedicated to attracting and retaining the best talent. Our positive workplace culture emphasises exceptional customer service and offers ample opportunities for learning and professional growth in this dynamic sector. Join us in our commitment to making a difference in the lives of older people.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 492
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tennessee Medical Foundation

5141 Virginia Way, Brentwood, Tennessee, 37027, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Tennessee Medical Foundation is a nonprofit organization dedicated to assisting Tennessee health professionals struggling with addiction, mental or emotional illness, behavioral issues, stress and burnout, and more. We also educate healthcare partners, facilities, and related organizations about impairment, recovery, and wellness. We rely on grants and donations to support our programs and services. Please support our work with struggling Tennessee health professionals today at https://e-tmf.org/support. Thank you!

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/warrigal-care.jpeg
Warrigal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tennessee-medical-foundation.jpeg
Tennessee Medical Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Warrigal
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tennessee Medical Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Warrigal in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tennessee Medical Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — Warrigal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Warrigal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tennessee Medical Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tennessee Medical Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/warrigal-care.jpeg
Warrigal
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tennessee-medical-foundation.jpeg
Tennessee Medical Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Warrigal company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tennessee Medical Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tennessee Medical Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Warrigal company.

In the current year, Tennessee Medical Foundation company and Warrigal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tennessee Medical Foundation company nor Warrigal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tennessee Medical Foundation company nor Warrigal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tennessee Medical Foundation company nor Warrigal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Warrigal company nor Tennessee Medical Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Warrigal nor Tennessee Medical Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Warrigal company nor Tennessee Medical Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Warrigal company employs more people globally than Tennessee Medical Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Warrigal nor Tennessee Medical Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Warrigal nor Tennessee Medical Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Warrigal nor Tennessee Medical Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Warrigal nor Tennessee Medical Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Warrigal nor Tennessee Medical Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Warrigal nor Tennessee Medical Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H