Comparison Overview

Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP

VS

Burke Niazi Ltd

Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP

2929 Allen Parkway, Houston, TX, 77019, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP, is a team of trial and appellate lawyers committed to obtaining victories for our clients. The firm handles cases involving complex commercial matters, construction disputes, commercial fraud, domestic and international arbitration, employment issues, environmental matters and toxic torts, insurance issues, oil and gas disputes, personal injury and wrongful death (including products liability litigation), and probate matters. Whether serving as counsel for plaintiffs or defendants, the firm has the experience, dedication, and resources to win.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Burke Niazi Ltd

470-474 Holloway Road,, London, undefined, N7 6NN, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Burke Niazi specialises in helping clients in difficult personal and family situations. We aim to assist those who have not been treated fairly or had their rights respected as they should. We always strive to achieve results to the clients upmost satisfaction and ensure that they leave our office with their dignity and confidence restored. We offer a wide range of legal services under legal aid and private rates, covering Family, Child Care, Divorce (including financial remedies), Residential and Commercial Landlord and Tenant, general Property, Housing, Community Care, Mental Health and Mental Capacity. Burke Niazi has three offices in London; located in, Islington, Catford and Stratford. Specialties Family, Child Care, Divorce (including financial remedies), Residential and Commercial Landlord and Tenant, general Property, Housing, Community Care, Mental Health and Mental Capacity.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ware-jackson-lee-chambers-llp.jpeg
Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burke-niazi-ltd.jpeg
Burke Niazi Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Burke Niazi Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burke Niazi Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Burke Niazi Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burke Niazi Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ware-jackson-lee-chambers-llp.jpeg
Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/burke-niazi-ltd.jpeg
Burke Niazi Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Burke Niazi Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Burke Niazi Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP company.

In the current year, Burke Niazi Ltd company and Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Burke Niazi Ltd company nor Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Burke Niazi Ltd company nor Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Burke Niazi Ltd company nor Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP company nor Burke Niazi Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP nor Burke Niazi Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP company nor Burke Niazi Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Burke Niazi Ltd company employs more people globally than Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP nor Burke Niazi Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP nor Burke Niazi Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP nor Burke Niazi Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP nor Burke Niazi Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP nor Burke Niazi Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ware, Jackson, Lee, O'Neill, Smith & Barrow, LLP nor Burke Niazi Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X