Comparison Overview

Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice

VS

AllOne Health

Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice

49 Sherwood Rd, Toowong, Queensland, 4066, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice is a Brisbane-based Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry practice. We offer evidence-based, best-practice treatment for a range of mental health concerns and diagnosed psychological disorders. Consultant Psychiatrists at the Practice offer assessment and treatment, providing complete care for all mental health concerns. The Toowong Practice is conveniently located in Jephson Street close to parking and public transport. The Clayfield Practice is located at 'Oriel Place'​, Level 1, 531 Sandgate Rd, with on-site free parking. Our Practice offers the following services: Clinical Psychology Clinical Neuropsychology Child Psychology Consultant Psychiatry

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

AllOne Health

100 North Pennsylvania Avenue, None, Wilkes Barre, Pennsylvania, US, 18701
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 650 and 699

AllOne Health brings better mental health and EAP benefits to organizations worldwide. Our Employee Assistance Program (EAP) makes it easy for employees to get fast, personalized care when it matters most with same-day access to counseling, immediate crisis support, and a full range of integrated whole health solutions. Beyond mental health and EAP benefits, AllOne Health’s team of experts delivers Consulting, Wellness, Crisis Management, and Concierge solutions to help organizations achieve their goals and improve performance. Trusted by over 9300 clients with 11+ million lives covered, AllOne Health drives positive change for organizations, powered by people who care. Learn more at AllOneHealth.com.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 473
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walters-green-clinical-psychology-practice.jpeg
Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allone-health-resources.jpeg
AllOne Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AllOne Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AllOne Health in 2026.

Incident History — Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AllOne Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AllOne Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walters-green-clinical-psychology-practice.jpeg
Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allone-health-resources.jpeg
AllOne Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Motivation: Fraud
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access to Email Account
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AllOne Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

AllOne Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice company has not reported any.

In the current year, AllOne Health company and Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AllOne Health company nor Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

AllOne Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither AllOne Health company nor Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice company nor AllOne Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice nor AllOne Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

AllOne Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice company.

AllOne Health company employs more people globally than Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice nor AllOne Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice nor AllOne Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice nor AllOne Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice nor AllOne Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice nor AllOne Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Walters Green Clinical Psychology Practice nor AllOne Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N