Comparison Overview

Walter Haas Graphics

VS

AirMark Corporation

Walter Haas Graphics

123 West 23rd Street, Hialeah, 33010, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Family owned & operated large format printing company with 61 years of experience in the industry. You can trust our tried and true wealth of knowledge of materials, inks, and processes to add value to any printing project you may have. We specialize in making excellent products in a wide variety of ways, anything from the smallest one color screen printed decal, to multicolor, digitally designed, and cut-to-shape masterpieces. We offer Posters, Banners, Decals, Stickers, Floor Graphics, Standing Displays, Outdoor Signage, Bus Advertising, Bus Shelters, Vehicle Wraps, Printed Fabrics, Table Wraps and Point of Purchase Signage. Let us know how we can help you make your visions come to life!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

AirMark Corporation

10001 Lake City Way NE, Seattle, Washington, 98125, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

As a national sign supply leader, AirMark is focused on improving productivity and profits for the sign, aerospace, and outdoor advertising industries. For more than 30 years, we’ve pushed the boundaries of commercial and industrial imaging equipment, providing companies across the globe with the sign-making production technology they need to win. Through the most advanced vinyl cutting, printing, labeling, and stenciling equipment, we supply businesses just like yours with the tools to transform operations into revenue-generating machines. And if it’s safety, organizational or instructional signage you need, you’ve come to the right place. Name your industry, AirMark has a solution.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walter-haas-graphics.jpeg
Walter Haas Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airmark-corporation.jpeg
AirMark Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Walter Haas Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AirMark Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Walter Haas Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AirMark Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Walter Haas Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Walter Haas Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AirMark Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AirMark Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walter-haas-graphics.jpeg
Walter Haas Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airmark-corporation.jpeg
AirMark Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Walter Haas Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AirMark Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, AirMark Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Walter Haas Graphics company.

In the current year, AirMark Corporation company and Walter Haas Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AirMark Corporation company nor Walter Haas Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AirMark Corporation company nor Walter Haas Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AirMark Corporation company nor Walter Haas Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Walter Haas Graphics company nor AirMark Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Walter Haas Graphics nor AirMark Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Walter Haas Graphics company nor AirMark Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

AirMark Corporation company employs more people globally than Walter Haas Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Walter Haas Graphics nor AirMark Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Walter Haas Graphics nor AirMark Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Walter Haas Graphics nor AirMark Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Walter Haas Graphics nor AirMark Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Walter Haas Graphics nor AirMark Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Walter Haas Graphics nor AirMark Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N