Comparison Overview

Walmex

VS

E.Leclerc

Walmex

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26

None

NAICS: 44511
NAICS Definition: Supermarkets and Other Grocery (except Convenience) Stores
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

E.Leclerc

26 quai Marcel Boyer Ivry sur Seine, Ile de France 94200, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Depuis plus de 70 ans, E.Leclerc poursuit un objectif : démocratiser la consommation, c'est l'expression de son utilité sociale. Cet engagement au service du plus grand nombre doit permettre à chacun d'accéder aux produits et services dont il a besoin ou envie, au quotidien. L'accessibilité, qu'elle soit une question de prix, de proximité ou d'information, est un combat permanent, sans cesse renouvelé par les attentes des consommateurs et les enjeux de société. Améliorer le pouvoir d'achat des consommateurs au quotidien ; Briser les monopoles pour ouvrir de nouveaux marchés, comme la parapharmacie ou les produits culturels ; Soutenir à la fois les producteurs français au travers des "Alliances Locales", et la préservation de l'environnement avec l'opération "Nettoyons la Nature" qui rassemble chaque année plusieurs centaines de milliers de bénévoles ; Développer les savoir-faire qui offrent une expérience toujours plus positive, durable et engagée dans la consommation ; tels sont les engagements qui caractérisent l'action de E.Leclerc et façonnent son image parmi les marques préférées des Français. Enseigne coopérative portée par 587 adhérents dans 721 centres et 690 drives, et par des millions de clients dans toute la France, E.Leclerc est leader du secteur de la grande distribution. Rejoignez le mouvement !

NAICS: 44511
NAICS Definition: Supermarkets and Other Grocery (except Convenience) Stores
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Walmex
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-leclerc.jpeg
E.Leclerc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Walmex
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
E.Leclerc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Groceries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Walmex in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Groceries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for E.Leclerc in 2025.

Incident History — Walmex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Walmex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — E.Leclerc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

E.Leclerc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Walmex
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-leclerc.jpeg
E.Leclerc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Walmex company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to E.Leclerc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, E.Leclerc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Walmex company.

In the current year, E.Leclerc company and Walmex company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither E.Leclerc company nor Walmex company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither E.Leclerc company nor Walmex company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither E.Leclerc company nor Walmex company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Walmex company nor E.Leclerc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Walmex nor E.Leclerc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Walmex company nor E.Leclerc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

E.Leclerc company employs more people globally than Walmex company, reflecting its scale as a Retail Groceries.

Neither Walmex nor E.Leclerc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Walmex nor E.Leclerc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Walmex nor E.Leclerc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Walmex nor E.Leclerc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Walmex nor E.Leclerc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Walmex nor E.Leclerc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H