Comparison Overview

WalletCard, Inc (Techstars '20)

VS

Akamai Technologies

WalletCard, Inc (Techstars '20)

Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Last Update: 2025-03-16 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Workplace safety is top priority with WalletCard's Training and Certification Tracking system, keeping your business regulatory compliant. #SaaS #Workplace #Safety #WorkSafe #Training #Certification #RiskManagement

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 2-10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Akamai Technologies

8 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA, US, 02142
Last Update: 2025-09-20 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

At Akamai, we make life better for billions of people, billions of times a day. Every day, billions of people around the world connect with their favorite brands to shop online, play the latest video games, log into mobile banking apps, learn remotely, share videos with friends, and so much more. They may not know it, but Akamai is there, powering and protecting life online. Over 20 years ago, we set out to solve the toughest challenge of the early internet: the โ€œWorld Wide Wait.โ€ And weโ€™ve been solving the internetโ€™s toughest challenges ever since, working toward our vision of a safer and more connected world. With the worldโ€™s most distributed compute platform โ€” from cloud to edge โ€” we make it easy for businesses to develop and run applications, while we keep experiences closer to users and threats farther away. Thatโ€™s why innovative companies worldwide choose Akamai to build, deliver, and secure their digital experiences. Our leading security, compute, and delivery solutions are helping global companies make life better for billions of people, billions of times a day. Devoted, determined problem-solvers who share a passion for technology, weโ€™re always pushing ground-breaking ideas and driving innovation. Want to power and protect life online, by solving the toughest challenges? Be part of an amazing team. Letโ€™s connect: LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/akamai-technologies Twitter: https://twitter.com/Akamai Blog: https://www.akamai.com/blog

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 10,198
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walletcard-inc.jpeg
WalletCard, Inc (Techstars '20)
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/akamai-technologies.jpeg
Akamai Technologies
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
WalletCard, Inc (Techstars '20)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Akamai Technologies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WalletCard, Inc (Techstars '20) in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Akamai Technologies in 2025.

Incident History โ€” WalletCard, Inc (Techstars '20) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WalletCard, Inc (Techstars '20) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Akamai Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Akamai Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walletcard-inc.jpeg
WalletCard, Inc (Techstars '20)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/akamai-technologies.jpeg
Akamai Technologies
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: UDP Flood
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both WalletCard, Inc (Techstars '20) company and Akamai Technologies company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Akamai Technologies company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas WalletCard, Inc (Techstars '20) company has not reported any.

In the current year, Akamai Technologies company and WalletCard, Inc (Techstars '20) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Akamai Technologies company nor WalletCard, Inc (Techstars '20) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Akamai Technologies company nor WalletCard, Inc (Techstars '20) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Akamai Technologies company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while WalletCard, Inc (Techstars '20) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither WalletCard, Inc (Techstars '20) company nor Akamai Technologies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Akamai Technologies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to WalletCard, Inc (Techstars '20) company.

Akamai Technologies company employs more people globally than WalletCard, Inc (Techstars '20) company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X