Comparison Overview

WalkMe™

VS

IGT

WalkMe™

71 Stevenson St floor 20, San Francisco, California, 94105, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900
https://www.walkme.com

Strong

WalkMe pioneered the Digital Adoption Platform (DAP) to simplify user experiences by combining insights, engagement, guidance and automation capabilities. Founded in 2011, WalkMe’s mission is to make digital adoption for employees and customers simple, while increasing enterprise productivity. Our platform works as an invisible layer of visual cues and personalized content placed on top of your website or enterprise software. WalkMe’s DAP is used by thousands of enterprises worldwide spanning all industries and platforms for onboarding, training new and existing users on new processes, and improving overall productivity by providing contextual guidance in real-time.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 1,117
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

IGT

6355 S Buffalo Dr, Las Vegas, NV, US, 89113
Last Update: 2025-09-24 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900
http://www.IGT.com

IGT is a leading global provider of gaming, digital and financial technology solutions, formed through the combination of International Game Technology PLC’s Gaming & Digital Business and Everi Holdings Inc. IGT’s offering spans gaming machines, game content and systems, iGaming, sports betting, cash access, loyalty and player engagement solutions, enabling it to deliver integrated, customer-centric experiences across land-based and digital environments. Organized into Gaming, Digital and FinTech business units, IGT drives innovation, efficiency and value for casino, digital and hospitality operators worldwide. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 10,423
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walkme.jpeg
WalkMe™
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/igt.jpeg
IGT
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
WalkMe™
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IGT
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WalkMe™ in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IGT in 2025.

Incident History — WalkMe™ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WalkMe™ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IGT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IGT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walkme.jpeg
WalkMe™
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/igt.jpeg
IGT
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both WalkMe™ company and IGT company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, IGT company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to WalkMe™ company.

In the current year, IGT company and WalkMe™ company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IGT company nor WalkMe™ company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IGT company nor WalkMe™ company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IGT company nor WalkMe™ company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither WalkMe™ company nor IGT company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

IGT company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to WalkMe™ company.

IGT company employs more people globally than WalkMe™ company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
References
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
References