Comparison Overview

Walker360

VS

Fineline Printing Group

Walker360

2501 E 5th Street, Montgomery, AL, 36107, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.walker360.com

Most print companies know two things: paper and ink. At Walker360, our expertise covers every range of marketing. From print and digital services to direct mail and variable data, we’re trained to help you find the right media for your message and add professional finishing touches to each of your projects. With over 75 years of experience in print, and a staff that is Google certified in cutting edge digital techniques, Walker360 gives you the tools you need to help your businesses succeed. Reach out and experience firsthand the service and expertise that has made us part of the top 1% of printing companies in the country.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Fineline Printing Group

8081 Zionsville Rd, Indianapolis, IN, 46268, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://FinelinePrintingGroup.com

Fineline Printing Group is a leading minority certified commercial graphics and mailing provider in the Midwest. Fineline’s customers get the best in purchasing efficiencies and brand quality from our wide range of products and services and state-of-the-art equipment. Our knowledgeable account executives personally handle the details of every project and look for ways to make it better or more efficient. That’s why our motto is: we will not ask for your business until we can improve it. Started in 1981, Fineline now fills a 70,000 square foot facility in Indianapolis with 55 employees and state-of the-art production equipment. Fineline is a privately held, minority-owned business certified by numerous local, state, and regional agencies including the NMSDC. Fineline is SOC2 Type2 Certified, compliant to ISO 9001:2008 standards, HIPAA compliance, and G7 Master qualified.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 62
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walker360.jpeg
Walker360
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fineline-printing-group.jpeg
Fineline Printing Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Walker360
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fineline Printing Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Walker360 in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fineline Printing Group in 2025.

Incident History — Walker360 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Walker360 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fineline Printing Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fineline Printing Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walker360.jpeg
Walker360
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fineline-printing-group.jpeg
Fineline Printing Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Walker360 company and Fineline Printing Group company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Fineline Printing Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Walker360 company.

In the current year, Fineline Printing Group company and Walker360 company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fineline Printing Group company nor Walker360 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fineline Printing Group company nor Walker360 company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fineline Printing Group company nor Walker360 company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Walker360 company nor Fineline Printing Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Walker360 nor Fineline Printing Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Walker360 company nor Fineline Printing Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fineline Printing Group company employs more people globally than Walker360 company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Walker360 nor Fineline Printing Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Walker360 nor Fineline Printing Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Walker360 nor Fineline Printing Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Walker360 nor Fineline Printing Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Walker360 nor Fineline Printing Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Walker360 nor Fineline Printing Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References