Comparison Overview

Walker360

VS

CyberChrome Inc.

Walker360

2501 E 5th Street, Montgomery, AL, 36107, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Most print companies know two things: paper and ink. At Walker360, our expertise covers every range of marketing. From print and digital services to direct mail and variable data, we’re trained to help you find the right media for your message and add professional finishing touches to each of your projects. With over 75 years of experience in print, and a staff that is Google certified in cutting edge digital techniques, Walker360 gives you the tools you need to help your businesses succeed. Reach out and experience firsthand the service and expertise that has made us part of the top 1% of printing companies in the country.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CyberChrome Inc.

19 Business Park Drive, Branford, CT, 06405, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

CyberChrome offers a wide range of digital print services and marketing solutions that increase response, reduce cost, and result in more successful marketing communication strategies. We use a wide compliment of tools and strategies to develop and deploy a broad range of marketing and customer communications. From print and direct mail to personal URL and E-Mail, our expertise in direct marketing and cross-media campaigning make us an industry leader.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walker360.jpeg
Walker360
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cyberchrome-inc..jpeg
CyberChrome Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Walker360
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CyberChrome Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Walker360 in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CyberChrome Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Walker360 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Walker360 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CyberChrome Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CyberChrome Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walker360.jpeg
Walker360
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cyberchrome-inc..jpeg
CyberChrome Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CyberChrome Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Walker360 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CyberChrome Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Walker360 company.

In the current year, CyberChrome Inc. company and Walker360 company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CyberChrome Inc. company nor Walker360 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CyberChrome Inc. company nor Walker360 company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CyberChrome Inc. company nor Walker360 company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Walker360 company nor CyberChrome Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Walker360 nor CyberChrome Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Walker360 company nor CyberChrome Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Walker360 company employs more people globally than CyberChrome Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Walker360 nor CyberChrome Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Walker360 nor CyberChrome Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Walker360 nor CyberChrome Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Walker360 nor CyberChrome Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Walker360 nor CyberChrome Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Walker360 nor CyberChrome Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N