Comparison Overview

Walker Engineering

VS

WearCheck

Walker Engineering

Units 27-31 Pit Hey Place, Pimbo, Skelmersdale, Lancashire, GB, WN8 9PS
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

We provide the best proactive and reactive full package engineering services. Based in Skelmersdale and established in 1999, Walker Engineering (NW) Ltd is approved for the design, installation, maintenance servicing and fabrication work for mechanical and electrical services. Our team of experts are passionate about delivering our comprehensive projects on time and on budget.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

WearCheck

Unit 4 The Terrace, Westway Office Park, Durban, 3629, ZA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

WearCheck, is Africa’s pre-eminent condition monitoring services provider, with 16 world class laboratories and 19 offices in nine countries. We focus on saving our customers money and time by boosting the reliability of their components and machinery. We predict when breakdowns may occur and advise our customers when to take corrective action to avoid unscheduled downtime. As the market leader in several sectors - including testing & analysis, asset reliability care and lubricant-enabled reliability services - WearCheck enhances the health of transformers, engines and other assets. Testing & analysis services scientifically monitor used oil from mechanical and electrical systems, transformer oil, water, fuel, greases etc., and over 800 000 samples are processed per annum. Water analysis - WearCheck’s newest service - tests water quality across a broad range of applications. The lubricant-enabled reliability service offers advice and products to enhance an operation’s lubricant management systems. WearCheck’s asset reliability care division offers services such as reliability solutions (balancing, vibration monitoring, alignment and more) and advanced field services (rope testing, technical compliance, non-destructive testing). WearCheck serves many industries - mining, wind turbines, earthmoving, industrial, transport, shipping, aircraft and electrical operations. We are proudly the only laboratory on the African continent that has ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 certification, and ISO 17025 accreditation.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 277
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walker-engineering.jpeg
Walker Engineering
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wearcheck-africa.jpeg
WearCheck
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Walker Engineering
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
WearCheck
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Walker Engineering in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WearCheck in 2025.

Incident History — Walker Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Walker Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — WearCheck (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WearCheck cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walker-engineering.jpeg
Walker Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wearcheck-africa.jpeg
WearCheck
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

WearCheck company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Walker Engineering company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, WearCheck company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Walker Engineering company.

In the current year, WearCheck company and Walker Engineering company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither WearCheck company nor Walker Engineering company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither WearCheck company nor Walker Engineering company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither WearCheck company nor Walker Engineering company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Walker Engineering company nor WearCheck company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Walker Engineering nor WearCheck holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Walker Engineering company nor WearCheck company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

WearCheck company employs more people globally than Walker Engineering company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Walker Engineering nor WearCheck holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Walker Engineering nor WearCheck holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Walker Engineering nor WearCheck holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Walker Engineering nor WearCheck holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Walker Engineering nor WearCheck holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Walker Engineering nor WearCheck holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H