Comparison Overview

VTK Legal

VS

Park & Co Lawyers

VTK Legal

Office Suite D222-224, Dean Clough, Halifax, West Yorkshire, GB, HX3 5AX
Last Update: 2025-11-28

At VTK we have become renowned for our expertise in legal services provided to the industry. We cover a wide range of services with the same professional approach and reliability. We pride ourselves on our consistently efficient and reliable service. We fully appreciate that once instructed, we are representing respected and renowned organisations, therefore maintain the highest level of service we can offer to our clients.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Park & Co Lawyers

54-66 Perrin Dr, Underwood, Queensland, 4119, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Here at Park & Co Lawyers, we are dedicated to supporting, promoting and protecting the rights of individuals. This requires in-depth legal knowledge and commitment to your individual case. We pride ourselves on the standard of our legal services across a wide spectrum of law. Each solicitor at Park & Co Lawyers specialises in multiple fields of practice, ranging across compensation, immigration, Employment and Civil Litigation. Our team consists of highly qualified professionals and staff from diverse cultural backgrounds, such as South Korea, China, New Zealand and Australia. With bilingual abilities, our professionals and staff are able to communicate fluently and accurately with our clients and accurately understand the concerns and needs of our clients. Everyone’s situation is different, and our solicitors provide comprehensive and personalised advice to achieve the best solutions for our clients to meet their needs both in the present and for the future. We aim to be “your lifetime lawyers”. We are committed to providing you with the best legal service in all aspects and stages of your life. ”As your lifetime lawyers, our highest priority is to build relationships of trust with our clients.“

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/park-and-co-lawyers.jpeg
Park & Co Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
VTK Legal
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Park & Co Lawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VTK Legal in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Park & Co Lawyers in 2025.

Incident History — VTK Legal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VTK Legal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Park & Co Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Park & Co Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vtk-legal.jpeg
VTK Legal
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/park-and-co-lawyers.jpeg
Park & Co Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Park & Co Lawyers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to VTK Legal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Park & Co Lawyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to VTK Legal company.

In the current year, Park & Co Lawyers company and VTK Legal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Park & Co Lawyers company nor VTK Legal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Park & Co Lawyers company nor VTK Legal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Park & Co Lawyers company nor VTK Legal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither VTK Legal company nor Park & Co Lawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither VTK Legal nor Park & Co Lawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither VTK Legal company nor Park & Co Lawyers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Park & Co Lawyers company employs more people globally than VTK Legal company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither VTK Legal nor Park & Co Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither VTK Legal nor Park & Co Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither VTK Legal nor Park & Co Lawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither VTK Legal nor Park & Co Lawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither VTK Legal nor Park & Co Lawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither VTK Legal nor Park & Co Lawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X