Comparison Overview

VoxDev

VS

Fitzgerald Technology Group

VoxDev

None, None, London, None, GB, None
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 700 and 749

VoxDev is a research into policy platform where economists and policy practitioners can weigh in on current and emerging development policy challenges. Expert contributors will provide insightful commentary, analysis, and evidence to bear on particular policy questions and challenges in a format that is accessible to both specialist and non-specialist audiences in development.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fitzgerald Technology Group

None
Last Update: 2025-12-02

With over 25 years of experience Fitzgerald Technology Group has provided unsurpassed consulting services to governments and clients around the globe. Our staff possesses the highest levels of security credentials serving as faculty members, guest lecturers and educational program developers for colleges and universities, along with serving as board members, council leaders, senior instructors and subject matter experts for associations, societies and agencies. Our executives serve on working groups and committees currently developing new international security standards and guidelines, which is a testament to our level of expertise. With multiple board certifications in Security Management, Threat Analysis, Vulnerability Assessments, Countermeasures Design and Organizational Resilience our teams are internationally recognized and have extensive knowledge and expertise in the areas of High Risk and Special Operations, Penetration Exercises, Standard and Emergency Policy Development, Tactical Response and Command / Control / Communications. Our mission is to utilize the most advanced technology and elite expertise to respond to any level of security risk anywhere in the world.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/voxdev.jpeg
VoxDev
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitzgerald-technology-group.jpeg
Fitzgerald Technology Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
VoxDev
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fitzgerald Technology Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VoxDev in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fitzgerald Technology Group in 2025.

Incident History — VoxDev (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VoxDev cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fitzgerald Technology Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fitzgerald Technology Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/voxdev.jpeg
VoxDev
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitzgerald-technology-group.jpeg
Fitzgerald Technology Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fitzgerald Technology Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to VoxDev company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fitzgerald Technology Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to VoxDev company.

In the current year, Fitzgerald Technology Group company and VoxDev company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fitzgerald Technology Group company nor VoxDev company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fitzgerald Technology Group company nor VoxDev company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fitzgerald Technology Group company nor VoxDev company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither VoxDev company nor Fitzgerald Technology Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither VoxDev nor Fitzgerald Technology Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither VoxDev company nor Fitzgerald Technology Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

VoxDev company employs more people globally than Fitzgerald Technology Group company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither VoxDev nor Fitzgerald Technology Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither VoxDev nor Fitzgerald Technology Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither VoxDev nor Fitzgerald Technology Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither VoxDev nor Fitzgerald Technology Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither VoxDev nor Fitzgerald Technology Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither VoxDev nor Fitzgerald Technology Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X