Comparison Overview

Volvo Cars

VS

Ford Motor Company

Volvo Cars

Assar Gabrielssons väg, Göteborg, SE
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://volvocars.com

Everything we do starts with people. Our purpose is to provide freedom to move, in a personal, sustainable and safe way. We are committed to simplifying our customers’ lives by offering better technology solutions that improve their impact on the world and bringing the most advanced mobility innovations to protect them, their loved ones and the people around them. Volvo Cars’ continued success is the result of a collaborative, diverse, and inclusive working environment. The people of Volvo Cars are committed to making a difference in our world. Today, we are one of the most well-known and respected car brands, with over 40,000 employees across the globe. We believe in bringing out the best in each other and harnessing the true power of people. At Volvo Cars your career is designed around your talents and aspirations so you can reach your full potential. Join us on a journey of a lifetime as we create safety, autonomous driving and electrification technologies of tomorrow. Read about our privacy policy here: http://volvoca.rs/privacy

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 23,024
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Ford Motor Company

None, None, Dearborn, Michigan, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
https://corporate.ford.com/careers

We don't just make history -- we make the future. Ford put the world on wheels over a century ago, and our teams are re-inventing icons and creating groundbreaking connected and electric vehicles for the next century. We believe in serving our customers, our communities, and the world. If you do, too, come move the world and make the future with us. Ford is a global company with shared ideals and a deep sense of family. From our earliest days as a pioneer of modern transportation, we have sought to make the world a better place – one that benefits lives, communities and the planet. We are here to provide the means for every person to move and pursue their dreams, serving as a bridge between personal freedom and the future of mobility. In that pursuit, our 186,000 employees around the world help to set the pace of innovation every day. Privacy Policy: https://www.ford.com/help/privacy/

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 143,957
Subsidiaries: 35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/volvocars.jpeg
Volvo Cars
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ford-motor-company.jpeg
Ford Motor Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Volvo Cars
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ford Motor Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Volvo Cars in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ford Motor Company in 2025.

Incident History — Volvo Cars (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Volvo Cars cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ford Motor Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ford Motor Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/volvocars.jpeg
Volvo Cars
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Database access, CICD access, Atlassian access, Domain access, WiFi hotspots and logins, Auth bearers, API access, PAC security access
Motivation: Monetary gain through data sale
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ford-motor-company.jpeg
Ford Motor Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Ford Motor Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Volvo Cars company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Volvo Cars and Ford Motor Company have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Ford Motor Company company and Volvo Cars company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ford Motor Company company nor Volvo Cars company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Volvo Cars company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Ford Motor Company company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ford Motor Company company nor Volvo Cars company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Ford Motor Company company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Volvo Cars company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Volvo Cars nor Ford Motor Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ford Motor Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Volvo Cars company.

Ford Motor Company company employs more people globally than Volvo Cars company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Volvo Cars nor Ford Motor Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Volvo Cars nor Ford Motor Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Volvo Cars nor Ford Motor Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Volvo Cars nor Ford Motor Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Volvo Cars nor Ford Motor Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Volvo Cars nor Ford Motor Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References