Comparison Overview

Voices For Children Foundation

VS

Grand Teton National Park Foundation

Voices For Children Foundation

601 NW 1st Ct, Miami, 33136, US
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799

Voices For Children Foundation, Inc. is a beacon of hope for abused, abandoned and neglected children and youth in the Miami-Dade County foster care system. We do this by providing critical support for advocacy, essential needs and positive experiences. Voices For Children Foundation, Inc. believes that support for children should not be a privilege. Our Vision is that every child in the foster care system has quality Guardians Ad Litem representation and fully centralized access to services and resources to meet their physical, social and emotional needs.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Grand Teton National Park Foundation

PO Box 249, Moose, WY, 83012, US
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799

Grand Teton National Park Foundation provides private financial support for special projects that enhance and protect Grand Teton National Park's treasured resources. Since 1997, our organization has given more than $20 million to the park for education-based capital projects, work and learn programs that reconnect youth to nature, and wildlife research and protection. By funding initiatives that go beyond what the National Park Service could accomplish on its own, Foundation friends solve park challenges and create a solid future for Grand Teton.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/voices-for-children-foundation.jpeg
Voices For Children Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grand-teton-national-park-foundation.jpeg
Grand Teton National Park Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Voices For Children Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Grand Teton National Park Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Voices For Children Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grand Teton National Park Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — Voices For Children Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Voices For Children Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Grand Teton National Park Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grand Teton National Park Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/voices-for-children-foundation.jpeg
Voices For Children Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grand-teton-national-park-foundation.jpeg
Grand Teton National Park Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Voices For Children Foundation company and Grand Teton National Park Foundation company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Grand Teton National Park Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Voices For Children Foundation company.

In the current year, Grand Teton National Park Foundation company and Voices For Children Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Grand Teton National Park Foundation company nor Voices For Children Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Grand Teton National Park Foundation company nor Voices For Children Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Grand Teton National Park Foundation company nor Voices For Children Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Voices For Children Foundation company nor Grand Teton National Park Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Voices For Children Foundation nor Grand Teton National Park Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Voices For Children Foundation company nor Grand Teton National Park Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Grand Teton National Park Foundation company employs more people globally than Voices For Children Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Voices For Children Foundation nor Grand Teton National Park Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Voices For Children Foundation nor Grand Teton National Park Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Voices For Children Foundation nor Grand Teton National Park Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Voices For Children Foundation nor Grand Teton National Park Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Voices For Children Foundation nor Grand Teton National Park Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Voices For Children Foundation nor Grand Teton National Park Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N