Comparison Overview

Vogue Business

VS

Scidoc Publishers

Vogue Business

London, WC2N, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://voguebusiness.com

Vogue Business is an online fashion industry publication launched in 2019. Headquartered at Condé Nast International in London, we offer a truly global perspective on the fashion industry, drawing on insights from Condé Nast’s network of journalists and business leaders in 29 markets to empower fashion professionals to make better business decisions.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 238
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Scidoc Publishers

16192 Coastal Highway, Lewes, 19958, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.scidoc.org

SciDoc Publications was established in 2012 with sole motive to disseminate knowledge amongst the scientific community. We as an Open Access publisher are on the way to be the world leader in the provision of STM (Science, Technology and Medicine) Open Access content. This publishing model allows us to reach millions of readers and give them access to scientific publications online free of charge. Through Open Access we intend to remove all barriers that traditional publishing models imposed. Keeping up to the pace of the 21st century and the vast global research scenario, we ensure accelerated distribution of new developments to the entire scientific community.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/voguebusiness.jpeg
Vogue Business
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scidoc-publishers.jpeg
Scidoc Publishers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Vogue Business
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Scidoc Publishers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vogue Business in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scidoc Publishers in 2025.

Incident History — Vogue Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vogue Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Scidoc Publishers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scidoc Publishers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/voguebusiness.jpeg
Vogue Business
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scidoc-publishers.jpeg
Scidoc Publishers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Vogue Business company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Scidoc Publishers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Scidoc Publishers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Vogue Business company.

In the current year, Scidoc Publishers company and Vogue Business company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Scidoc Publishers company nor Vogue Business company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Scidoc Publishers company nor Vogue Business company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Scidoc Publishers company nor Vogue Business company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Vogue Business company nor Scidoc Publishers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Vogue Business nor Scidoc Publishers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Vogue Business company nor Scidoc Publishers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Vogue Business company employs more people globally than Scidoc Publishers company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Vogue Business nor Scidoc Publishers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Vogue Business nor Scidoc Publishers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Vogue Business nor Scidoc Publishers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Vogue Business nor Scidoc Publishers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Vogue Business nor Scidoc Publishers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Vogue Business nor Scidoc Publishers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References