Comparison Overview

Vodafone

VS

Reliance Communications

Vodafone

1 Kingdom Street, Paddington Central, London, GB, W2 6BY
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 650 and 699

At Vodafone, we believe that connectivity is a force for good. If we use it for the things that really matter, it can improve people's lives and the world around us. Through our technology we empower people, connecting everyone regardless of who they are or where they live, we protect the planet and help our customers do the same. But we’re not just shaping the future of technology for our customers – we’re shaping the future for everyone who joins our team too. When you work with us, you’re part of a global mission to connect people, solve complex challenges, and create a sustainable, more inclusive world. If you want to grow your career whilst finding the perfect balance between work and life, Vodafone offers the opportunities and support to help you belong and make a real impact. #TogetherWeCan

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 132,162
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
4

Reliance Communications

A Block, 2nd Floor, Reliance Communications Limited, DAKC, Kopar Khairane, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400710
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749

Reliance Communications Limited, founded by the late Shri Dhirubhai H Ambani (1932-2002), has Corporate clientele that includes 40,000 Indian and multinational corporations, including small and medium enterprises. Reliance Communications has established a pan-India, Next-Generation, digital network that is capable of supporting best-of-class services spanning the entire communications value chain. Reliance Communications owns and operates the world's largest Next-Generation IP-enabled connectivity infrastructure, comprising fiber optic cable systems in India, the USA, Europe, Middle East and the Asia Pacific region.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 18,273
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vodafone.jpeg
Vodafone
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliance-communications.jpeg
Reliance Communications
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Vodafone
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Reliance Communications
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vodafone in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reliance Communications in 2025.

Incident History — Vodafone (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vodafone cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Reliance Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reliance Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vodafone.jpeg
Vodafone
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Data Breach
Motivation: Unauthorized Access to Sensitive Data
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 04/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliance-communications.jpeg
Reliance Communications
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Reliance Communications company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Vodafone company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Vodafone company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Reliance Communications company has not reported any.

In the current year, Reliance Communications company and Vodafone company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Vodafone company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Reliance Communications company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Vodafone company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Reliance Communications company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Vodafone company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Reliance Communications company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Vodafone company nor Reliance Communications company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Vodafone nor Reliance Communications holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Vodafone company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Reliance Communications company.

Vodafone company employs more people globally than Reliance Communications company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Vodafone nor Reliance Communications holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Vodafone nor Reliance Communications holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Vodafone nor Reliance Communications holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Vodafone nor Reliance Communications holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Vodafone nor Reliance Communications holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Vodafone nor Reliance Communications holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H