Comparison Overview

Vagina Museum

VS

Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken

Vagina Museum

18 Victoria Park Square, London, England, E2 9PF, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vaginamuseum.co.uk

The Vagina Museum is the project to make the world’s first bricks and mortar museum about the vagina and the gynaecological anatomy. It will take a holistic view of the gynaecological anatomy and there will be four permanent galleries: science, culture, society and history. There will also be a temporary exhibition space and a packed programme of events. The Museum will have an extensive outreach programme and a policy department. Oh, and a cafe with vulva cupcakes of course. The first step on the Vagina Museum journey is a pop up museum which will travel around the country. The Museum will then graduate to an interim space in a semi-permanent location as a proof of concept for the final permanent home for the Vagina Museum in the UK. For more information on the Vagina Museum, please visit: www.vaginamuseum.co.uk https://twitter.com/vagina_museum https://www.instagram.com/vagina_museum https://www.facebook.com/vmuseum/

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 57
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken

Coehoornsingel 14, Groningen, 9711 BS, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.groningerkerken.nl

Het idee om het rijke maar bedreigde bezit van historische kerkgebouwen in de provincie Groningen in stand te houden, ontstond in 1969. Niet alleen het behoud van dit monumentale erfgoed, maar ook het wekken van belangstelling voor de rijke geschiedenis van de provincie Groningen en het Groninger landschap waarin de monumentale kerken als beeldbepalende elementen zijn opgenomen, staan voor de stichting centraal. Groninger Kerken heeft zich de afgelopen 50+ jaar in regionaal en nationaal verband ontwikkeld tot een succesvolle en toonaangevende, eigentijdse organisatie op het gebied van restauratie en hergebruik van cultureel en religieus erfgoed.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vmuseum.jpeg
Vagina Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stichting-oude-groninger-kerken.jpeg
Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Vagina Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vagina Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken in 2026.

Incident History — Vagina Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vagina Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vmuseum.jpeg
Vagina Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stichting-oude-groninger-kerken.jpeg
Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Vagina Museum company and Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Vagina Museum company.

In the current year, Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken company and Vagina Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken company nor Vagina Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken company nor Vagina Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken company nor Vagina Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Vagina Museum company nor Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Vagina Museum nor Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Vagina Museum company nor Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Vagina Museum company employs more people globally than Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Vagina Museum nor Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Vagina Museum nor Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Vagina Museum nor Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Vagina Museum nor Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Vagina Museum nor Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Vagina Museum nor Stichting Oude Groninger Kerken holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References