Comparison Overview

Vagina Museum

VS

Rupert

Vagina Museum

18 Victoria Park Square, London, England, E2 9PF, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vaginamuseum.co.uk

The Vagina Museum is the project to make the world’s first bricks and mortar museum about the vagina and the gynaecological anatomy. It will take a holistic view of the gynaecological anatomy and there will be four permanent galleries: science, culture, society and history. There will also be a temporary exhibition space and a packed programme of events. The Museum will have an extensive outreach programme and a policy department. Oh, and a cafe with vulva cupcakes of course. The first step on the Vagina Museum journey is a pop up museum which will travel around the country. The Museum will then graduate to an interim space in a semi-permanent location as a proof of concept for the final permanent home for the Vagina Museum in the UK. For more information on the Vagina Museum, please visit: www.vaginamuseum.co.uk https://twitter.com/vagina_museum https://www.instagram.com/vagina_museum https://www.facebook.com/vmuseum/

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 57
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Rupert

Meskeriotoju g. 33, Vilnius, undefined, 10100, LT
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rupert.lt

Rupert is an educational exhibition center devoted to establishing close cooperation between artists, thinkers, researchers, and other cultural actors through interdisciplinary programs and residencies. A knowledge-based platform for innovative creative production, Rupert integrates with the social and cultural framework of the city of Vilnius while simultaneously supporting a strong international focus.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vmuseum.jpeg
Vagina Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rupert.jpeg
Rupert
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Vagina Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rupert
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vagina Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rupert in 2026.

Incident History — Vagina Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vagina Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rupert (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rupert cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vmuseum.jpeg
Vagina Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rupert.jpeg
Rupert
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rupert company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Vagina Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rupert company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Vagina Museum company.

In the current year, Rupert company and Vagina Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rupert company nor Vagina Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rupert company nor Vagina Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rupert company nor Vagina Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Vagina Museum company nor Rupert company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Vagina Museum nor Rupert holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Vagina Museum company nor Rupert company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Vagina Museum company employs more people globally than Rupert company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Vagina Museum nor Rupert holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Vagina Museum nor Rupert holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Vagina Museum nor Rupert holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Vagina Museum nor Rupert holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Vagina Museum nor Rupert holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Vagina Museum nor Rupert holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References