Comparison Overview

Vizioncore Inc.

VS

Meta

Vizioncore Inc.

2300 Barrington Road Suite 700 Hoffman Estates, IL 60169, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Vizioncore, the leader in virtualization management, is now Quest Softwareโ€™s Server Virtualization Management group. Quest creates simple-to-use IT management software that saves time and money across physical, virtual, and cloud environments. Our innovative solutions help simplify the toughest IT challenges for more than 100,000 customers worldwide. Quest simplifies virtualization management from server to desktop, enabling organizations to reduce administration costs and make more efficient use of virtualized computing resources. Quest Server Virtualization Management solutions span data protection, monitoring and administration to help organizations improve operational efficiency, improve productivity, and manage private clouds.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 201-500
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Meta

1 Hacker Way, None, Menlo Park, CA, US, 94025
Last Update: 2025-09-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Meta's mission is to build the future of human connection and the technology that makes it possible. Our technologies help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses. When Facebook launched in 2004, it changed the way people connect. Apps like Messenger, Instagram and WhatsApp further empowered billions around the world. Now, Meta is moving beyond 2D screens toward immersive experiences like augmented and virtual reality to help build the next evolution in social technology. To help create a safe and respectful online space, we encourage constructive conversations on this page. Please note the following: โ€ข Start with an open mind. Whether you agree or disagree, engage with empathy. โ€ข Comments violating our Community Standards will be removed or hidden. Please treat everybody with respect. โ€ข Keep it constructive. Use your interactions here to learn about and grow your understanding of others. โ€ข Our moderators are here to uphold these guidelines for the benefit of everyone, every day. โ€ข If you are seeking support for issues related to your Facebook account, please reference our Help Center (https://www.facebook.com/help) or Help Community (https://www.facebook.com/help/community). For a full listing of our jobs, visit https://www.metacareers.com

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 139,000
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
7
Known data breaches
12
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Vizioncore Inc.
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meta.jpeg
Meta
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Vizioncore Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Meta
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vizioncore Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Meta has 1421.74% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History โ€” Vizioncore Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vizioncore Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Meta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Vizioncore Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meta.jpeg
Meta
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Fake Emails, Fake Websites, Spoofed URLs, AI-Generated Scam Sites
Motivation: Financial Gain, Identity Theft, Data Harvesting for Dark Web Sales
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Poor Document Handling, Insufficient Redaction, Metadata Exposure, AI Scraping of Public Datasets
Motivation: Financial Gain (Credential Theft), Competitive Intelligence, Reputational Damage, Regulatory Exploitation
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Fake Facebook Security Alert, User-Executed Command via File Explorer, AI-Generated Image Payloads, PowerShell Script Embedding
Motivation: Data Theft, Credential Harvesting, Financial Gain (Potential Ransomware/Fraud)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Meta company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Vizioncore Inc. company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Meta company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Vizioncore Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Meta company has reported more cyber incidents than Vizioncore Inc. company.

Neither Meta company nor Vizioncore Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Meta company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Vizioncore Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Meta company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Vizioncore Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Meta company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Vizioncore Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Meta company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Vizioncore Inc. company.

Meta company employs more people globally than Vizioncore Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

pwn.college DOJO is an education platform for learning cybersecurity. In versions up to and including commit 781d91157cfc234a434d0bab45cbcf97894c642e, the /workspace endpoint contains an improper authentication vulnerability that allows an attacker to access any active Windows VM without proper authorization. The vulnerability occurs in the view_desktop function where the user is retrieved via a URL parameter without verifying that the requester has administrative privileges. An attacker can supply any user ID and arbitrary password in the request parameters to impersonate another user. When requesting a Windows desktop service, the function does not validate the supplied password before generating access credentials, allowing the attacker to obtain an iframe source URL that grants full access to the target user's Windows VM. This impacts all users with active Windows VMs, as an attacker can access and modify data on the Windows machine and in the home directory of the associated Linux machine via the Z: drive. This issue has been patched in commit 467db0b9ea0d9a929dc89b41f6eb59f7cfc68bef. No known workarounds exist.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victimโ€™s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victimโ€™s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victimโ€™s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Connect versions 12.9 and earlier are affected by a URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to redirect users to malicious websites. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must click on a crafted link.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N