Comparison Overview

VivoSecurity Inc.

VS

Sutherland

VivoSecurity Inc.

1247 Russell Ave, Los Altos, 94024, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 550 and 599

VivoSecurity develops rigorous statistical and AI models, that meet the Federal Reserves and office of the controller guidance for model risk management (SR11-7), to forecast the cost and probability of data breach. The vivo team has PhD level scientists and statisticians who have developed novel, yet rigorous methods to leverage from the numerous state and federal reporting requirements regarding data breach.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Sutherland

1160 Pittsford-Victor Road, Pittsford (Rochester), NY, 14534, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Artificial Intelligence. Automation. Cloud engineering. Advanced analytics. For business leaders, these are key factors of success. For us, they’re our core expertise. At Sutherland, we are a leading global business and digital transformation partner. Our services span a diversified range of categories, from Healthcare, Insurance, Banking & Financial Services, Communications, Media & Entertainment, Technology, Travel & Hospitality, Logistics, Retail, Energy & Utilities. We work with iconic brands worldwide, and we bring them a unique value proposition through market-leading technology and business process excellence. We’ve created over 200 unique inventions under several patents across AI and other critical technologies. Leveraging our advanced products and platforms, we drive digital transformation, optimize critical business operations, reinvent experiences and pioneer new solutions, all provided through a seamless “as a service” model. Inside Sutherland, our commitment goes beyond technology. We are a talented team of 38,000+ people working in more than 60 global delivery centers. Each and every one of us is passionate about technology and committed to results. For each company, we provide new keys for their businesses, the people they work with, and the customers they serve. We tailor proven and rapid formulas to fit their unique DNA. We bring together human expertise and artificial intelligence. In short, we do digital chemistry. It unlocks new possibilities, great client partnerships, and transformative outcomes. Sutherland Unlocking digital performance. Delivering measurable results. Know more: www.sutherlandglobal.com

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 56,636
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vivosecurity-inc-.jpeg
VivoSecurity Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sutherland-global-services.jpeg
Sutherland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
VivoSecurity Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sutherland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

VivoSecurity Inc. has 36.99% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Sutherland has 36.99% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — VivoSecurity Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VivoSecurity Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sutherland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sutherland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vivosecurity-inc-.jpeg
VivoSecurity Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in security frameworks
Motivation: Financial gain (selling data on dark web)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sutherland-global-services.jpeg
Sutherland
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2014
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Theft of Computers
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Sutherland company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to VivoSecurity Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sutherland company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to VivoSecurity Inc. company.

In the current year, Sutherland and VivoSecurity Inc. have reported a similar number of cyber incidents.

Neither Sutherland company nor VivoSecurity Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Sutherland company and VivoSecurity Inc. company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Sutherland company nor VivoSecurity Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither VivoSecurity Inc. company nor Sutherland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither VivoSecurity Inc. nor Sutherland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sutherland company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to VivoSecurity Inc. company.

Sutherland company employs more people globally than VivoSecurity Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither VivoSecurity Inc. nor Sutherland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither VivoSecurity Inc. nor Sutherland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither VivoSecurity Inc. nor Sutherland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither VivoSecurity Inc. nor Sutherland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither VivoSecurity Inc. nor Sutherland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither VivoSecurity Inc. nor Sutherland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N