Comparison Overview

VivoSecurity Inc.

VS

Hitachi

VivoSecurity Inc.

1247 Russell Ave, Los Altos, 94024, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://VivoSecurity.com

VivoSecurity develops rigorous statistical and AI models, that meet the Federal Reserves and office of the controller guidance for model risk management (SR11-7), to forecast the cost and probability of data breach. The vivo team has PhD level scientists and statisticians who have developed novel, yet rigorous methods to leverage from the numerous state and federal reporting requirements regarding data breach.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Hitachi

1-6-6, Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, None, Tokyo, Japan, JP, 100-8280
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
https://www.hitachi.com

Since its founding in 1910, Hitachi has responded to the expectations of society and its customers through technology and innovation. Our mission is to “Contribute to society through the development of superior, original technology and products.” Over the past 100+ years this commitment has led us to work towards creating a more sustainable society through our “Social Innovation Business”. We work to apply our expertise in information technology (IT), operational technology (OT), and a wide variety of products to advance social infrastructure systems and improve quality of life across the world. Hitachi’s Social Innovation Business is centered around 5 growth sectors: Mobility, Smart Life, Industry, Energy, and IT. Globally, we have nearly 300,000 employees who are working to improve people’s quality of life and our customers’ social, environmental, and economic values to create a sustainable future. The challenges we face as a society are unprecedented, but so are the opportunities. Together, let’s start powering good.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 36,169
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vivosecurity-inc-.jpeg
VivoSecurity Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hitachi.jpeg
Hitachi
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
VivoSecurity Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hitachi
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

VivoSecurity Inc. has 36.99% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hitachi in 2025.

Incident History — VivoSecurity Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VivoSecurity Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hitachi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hitachi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vivosecurity-inc-.jpeg
VivoSecurity Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in security frameworks
Motivation: Financial gain (selling data on dark web)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hitachi.jpeg
Hitachi
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Stolen credentials, Vulnerability exploitation, Phishing
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Radio Frequency (RF) communications
Motivation: Disruption of operations, brake system failures
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Hitachi company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to VivoSecurity Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Hitachi company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to VivoSecurity Inc. company.

In the current year, Hitachi company has reported more cyber incidents than VivoSecurity Inc. company.

Hitachi company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while VivoSecurity Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

VivoSecurity Inc. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Hitachi company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Hitachi company nor VivoSecurity Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Hitachi company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while VivoSecurity Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither VivoSecurity Inc. nor Hitachi holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Hitachi company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to VivoSecurity Inc. company.

Hitachi company employs more people globally than VivoSecurity Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither VivoSecurity Inc. nor Hitachi holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither VivoSecurity Inc. nor Hitachi holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither VivoSecurity Inc. nor Hitachi holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither VivoSecurity Inc. nor Hitachi holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither VivoSecurity Inc. nor Hitachi holds HIPAA certification.

Neither VivoSecurity Inc. nor Hitachi holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References