Comparison Overview

Viva la Mama

VS

Senior.com

Viva la Mama

Leipzig & Berlin, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 750 and 799

Viva la Mama ist eine spezialisierte D2C-Brand für funktionale Bekleidung rund um Schwangerschaft und Babytragen. Wir entwickeln hochwertige, langlebige Jacken und Westen, die Eltern von der Schwangerschaft über die Tragezeit bis weit darüber hinaus begleiten. Unsere Produkte verbinden durchdachtes Design mit Funktionalität und moderner Ästhetik. Jedes Modell ist so konzipiert, dass es sich flexibel an unterschiedliche Phasen des Familienlebens anpasst – sei es mit oder ohne Baby, in Bewegung oder im Alltag. Die Entwicklung erfolgt in Deutschland, die Produktion verantwortungsvoll in einer ausgewählten europäischen Manufaktur. So stellen wir Qualität, konsistente Verarbeitung und faire Bedingungen sicher. Als Vertical Brand vereinen wir Produktentwicklung, E-Commerce, Kundenservice und Logistik unter einem Dach. Dadurch schaffen wir ein konsistentes Markenerlebnis und können nachhaltig, transparent und kundennah arbeiten. Unser Anspruch: funktionale, vielseitige und nachhaltige Produkte, die echte Alltagssituationen lösen – statt kurzlebiger Fast-Fashion.

NAICS: 4541
NAICS Definition: Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Senior.com

15791 Rockfield Blvd, Irvine, California, 92618, US
Last Update: 2025-12-26
Between 750 and 799

Senior.com is the #1 Online resource for Seniors & Caregivers because of 1 thing.......WE CARE! One of our specialties is helping people stay in their homes longer. With the right equipment installed in a home, we can prevent falls. Fall prevention is the #1 way to make sure you don’t slide into a new stage of care that might require assisted living, costing 10's of thousands of dollars. Our Customer Care Specialists can educate you about improving different hot spots in your home so you can maintain your independence for as long as possible. Today, Senior.com has 2.7 million members and we are rapidly growing every day. We offer over 500 top brands and sell over 150,000 products throughout the United States. We have earned our reputation by providing quality content, personalized customer service and being a trusted supplier.

NAICS: 454
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 382
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/viva-la-mama.jpeg
Viva la Mama
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/senior.com.jpeg
Senior.com
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Viva la Mama
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Senior.com
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Viva la Mama in 2025.

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Senior.com in 2025.

Incident History — Viva la Mama (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Viva la Mama cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Senior.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Senior.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/viva-la-mama.jpeg
Viva la Mama
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/senior.com.jpeg
Senior.com
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Viva la Mama company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Senior.com company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Senior.com company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Viva la Mama company.

In the current year, Senior.com company and Viva la Mama company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Senior.com company nor Viva la Mama company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Senior.com company nor Viva la Mama company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Senior.com company nor Viva la Mama company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Viva la Mama company nor Senior.com company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Viva la Mama nor Senior.com holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Senior.com company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Viva la Mama company.

Senior.com company employs more people globally than Viva la Mama company, reflecting its scale as a Online and Mail Order Retail.

Neither Viva la Mama nor Senior.com holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Viva la Mama nor Senior.com holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Viva la Mama nor Senior.com holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Viva la Mama nor Senior.com holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Viva la Mama nor Senior.com holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Viva la Mama nor Senior.com holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. Affected is an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPUserSetting. Performing manipulation of the argument delno results in stack-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. This impacts an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPServer. Such manipulation of the argument ip1 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in omec-project UPF up to 2.1.3-dev. This affects the function handleSessionEstablishmentRequest of the file /pfcpiface/pfcpiface/messages_session.go of the component PFCP Session Establishment Request Handler. This manipulation causes null pointer dereference. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in floooh sokol up to 16cbcc864012898793cd2bc57f802499a264ea40. The impacted element is the function _sg_pipeline_desc_defaults in the library sokol_gfx.h. The manipulation results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The patch is identified as 5d11344150973f15e16d3ec4ee7550a73fb995e0. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in PbootCMS up to 3.2.12. The affected element is the function get_user_ip of the file core/function/handle.php of the component Header Handler. The manipulation of the argument X-Forwarded-For leads to use of less trusted source. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X