Comparison Overview

VisionOn

VS

Dinasa

VisionOn

1407 Broadway, New York, 10018, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 700 and 749

Vision On is New York’s top retoucher since 2002. With decades of retouching experience behind us — across some of the biggest names in fashion, beauty, food & beverage, and more — you can trust that your retouching needs are handled. Every brand has unique guidelines and every site has specific requirements. We handle retouching from top to bottom, delivering the images you want and the files exactly as requested. We pride ourselves on prompt delivery — with little back and forth along the way. ️Fortune 500 Brands Trust Us. Our client shortlist includes: E.l.f., Lacoste, Maybelline, Nike, Target, Burberry, Calvin Klein, Giorgio Armani, Neiman Marcus, and countless others. Let’s work together — [email protected]

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dinasa

Calle José Barbastre, 10, Madrid, 28017, ES
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Dinasa es una de las más importantes empresas en la prestación de servicios fototécnicos y digitales. Con más de 40 años de experiencia y una gran apuesta tecnológica de futuro, aporta soluciones visuales sin limites a sus clientes. Dinasa es un Laboratorio Fotográfico Digital con casi 40 años de experiencia. Fundado en el año 1.964, actualmente es una de las empresas del sector fotográfico más imprtantes de Europa. Nuestra actividad abarca todo el mundo de la imagen, desde el aficionado al profesional ; enfocada a la Publicidad, Decoracion e Interiorismo, Arte ,etc. Los laboratorios Dinasa integran las más modernas Tecnologías Digitales junto a las técnicas fotográficas tradicionales.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 80
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vision-on.jpeg
VisionOn
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dinasa.jpeg
Dinasa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
VisionOn
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dinasa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VisionOn in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dinasa in 2025.

Incident History — VisionOn (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VisionOn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dinasa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dinasa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vision-on.jpeg
VisionOn
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dinasa.jpeg
Dinasa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dinasa company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to VisionOn company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dinasa company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to VisionOn company.

In the current year, Dinasa company and VisionOn company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dinasa company nor VisionOn company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dinasa company nor VisionOn company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dinasa company nor VisionOn company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither VisionOn company nor Dinasa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither VisionOn nor Dinasa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither VisionOn company nor Dinasa company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dinasa company employs more people globally than VisionOn company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither VisionOn nor Dinasa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither VisionOn nor Dinasa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither VisionOn nor Dinasa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither VisionOn nor Dinasa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither VisionOn nor Dinasa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither VisionOn nor Dinasa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N