Comparison Overview

Virtual Packaging

VS

Professional Printers

Virtual Packaging

840 Mustang Dr, Grapevine, Texas, 76051, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Virtual Packaging is a full service packaging prototype house specializing in a broad range of mock-up capabilities. Since 1996 our full production facility based outside of Dallas, TX has been serving our US and International based clients with first class customer service and competitive mock-up prices. With over 200 combined years of packaging industry experience, our experts know their prototypes. Feel free to give us a call at (817) 328-3900 or email us at [email protected]

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Professional Printers

1730 Old Dunbar Road, West Columbia, SC, 29172, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Professional Printers, Inc. is a privately owned Graphic Arts company working with a diverse client base including regional, national and international Fortune 500 companies. We offer our clients a full range of services including marketing support, online storefront creation, digital, heat-set web and offset printing, mailing and fulfillment. We have developed competitive solutions that cut cost, and make our clients more effective in their own arenas, while maintaining the personal interaction that makes Professional Printers, Inc. distinct. Mission Statement: We exist to strengthen our client’s success as their preferred partner in print and graphic communications. -- Follow us on Facebook: Facebook.com/ProPrintersSC -- Follow us on Twitter: @ProPrintersSC -- Follow us on Pinterest: Pinterest.com/ProPrintersSC

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/virtual-packaging.jpeg
Virtual Packaging
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/professional-printers.jpeg
Professional Printers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Virtual Packaging
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Professional Printers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Virtual Packaging in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Professional Printers in 2025.

Incident History — Virtual Packaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Virtual Packaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Professional Printers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Professional Printers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/virtual-packaging.jpeg
Virtual Packaging
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/professional-printers.jpeg
Professional Printers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Professional Printers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Virtual Packaging company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Professional Printers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Virtual Packaging company.

In the current year, Professional Printers company and Virtual Packaging company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Professional Printers company nor Virtual Packaging company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Professional Printers company nor Virtual Packaging company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Professional Printers company nor Virtual Packaging company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Virtual Packaging company nor Professional Printers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Virtual Packaging nor Professional Printers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Virtual Packaging company nor Professional Printers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Professional Printers company employs more people globally than Virtual Packaging company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Virtual Packaging nor Professional Printers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Virtual Packaging nor Professional Printers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Virtual Packaging nor Professional Printers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Virtual Packaging nor Professional Printers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Virtual Packaging nor Professional Printers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Virtual Packaging nor Professional Printers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N