Comparison Overview

Virginia Office of the Attorney General

VS

Baker McKenzie

Virginia Office of the Attorney General

202 N. 9th Street, Richmond, VA, US, 23219
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 650 and 699

The Virginia Office of the Attorney General is the Commonwealth's law firm. In addition to representing the interests of the people of Virginia, our clients are Virginia state government and its agencies, boards and commissions. The Office of the Attorney General includes a chief deputy attorney general, four deputy attorneys general who oversee 21 specialized sections of the law, and other employees including assistant attorneys general, additional lawyers appointed as counsel to particular agencies or universities, legal assistants, legal secretaries and other professional support staff.

NAICS: 54111
NAICS Definition: Offices of Lawyers
Employees: 351
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Baker McKenzie

300 E Randolph St, Chicago, IL, US, 60601
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Integrated legal solutions to complex business challenges. The global business community is more interconnected than ever before. Opportunities and risks spill across different markets, sectors and areas of law. A connected perspective is essential in delivering business objectives while mitigating risk. Our integrated client solutions provide seamless advice underpinned by deep practice, sector expertise, and first-rate local market knowledge. Armed with Baker McKenzie's insight and foresight, business leaders can feel confident driving sustainable – and inclusive growth. Learn more: https://www.bakermckenzie.com/en/expertise/solutions-connected-world Content may include attorney advertising.

NAICS: 54111
NAICS Definition: Offices of Lawyers
Employees: 11,170
Subsidiaries: 30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/virginia-office-of-attorney-general.jpeg
Virginia Office of the Attorney General
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baker-&-mckenzie.jpeg
Baker McKenzie
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Virginia Office of the Attorney General
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Baker McKenzie
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Average (This Year)

Virginia Office of the Attorney General has 13.64% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baker McKenzie in 2025.

Incident History — Virginia Office of the Attorney General (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Virginia Office of the Attorney General cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Baker McKenzie (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baker McKenzie cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/virginia-office-of-attorney-general.jpeg
Virginia Office of the Attorney General
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Data theft and extortion
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baker-&-mckenzie.jpeg
Baker McKenzie
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Baker McKenzie company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Virginia Office of the Attorney General company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Virginia Office of the Attorney General company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Baker McKenzie company has not reported any.

In the current year, Virginia Office of the Attorney General company has reported more cyber incidents than Baker McKenzie company.

Virginia Office of the Attorney General company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Baker McKenzie company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Baker McKenzie company nor Virginia Office of the Attorney General company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Baker McKenzie company nor Virginia Office of the Attorney General company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Virginia Office of the Attorney General company nor Baker McKenzie company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Virginia Office of the Attorney General nor Baker McKenzie holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Baker McKenzie company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Virginia Office of the Attorney General company.

Baker McKenzie company employs more people globally than Virginia Office of the Attorney General company, reflecting its scale as a Law Practice.

Neither Virginia Office of the Attorney General nor Baker McKenzie holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Virginia Office of the Attorney General nor Baker McKenzie holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Virginia Office of the Attorney General nor Baker McKenzie holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Virginia Office of the Attorney General nor Baker McKenzie holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Virginia Office of the Attorney General nor Baker McKenzie holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Virginia Office of the Attorney General nor Baker McKenzie holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X