Comparison Overview

Virginia Museum of History & Culture

VS

Museo Nazionale di Fotografia

Virginia Museum of History & Culture

428 N Arthur Ashe Boulevard, Richmond, Virginia, 23220, US
Last Update: 2026-01-16

The Virginia Museum of History & Culture is owned and operated by the Virginia Historical Society — a private, non-profit organization established in 1831. The historical society is the oldest cultural organization in Virginia, and one of the oldest and most distinguished history organizations in the nation. For use in its state history museum and its renowned research library, the historical society cares for a collection of nearly nine million items representing the ever-evolving story of Virginia. The Virginia Museum of History & Culture is located at 428 N Arthur Ashe Boulevard in Richmond’s Museum District. Hours Galleries and Museum Shop, Monday – Sunday 10:00 am – 5:00 pm Library, Monday – Saturday 10:00 am – 5:00 pm For more information about the museum, you may call 804.340.1800 or visit VirginiaHistory.org.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 82
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Museo Nazionale di Fotografia

via Frova 10, Cinisello Balsamo, 20092, IT
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Il Museo di Fotografia Contemporanea, unico museo pubblico in Italia dedicato alla fotografia, è una struttura attiva nel campo della conservazione, catalogazione, studio e divulgazione della fotografia, con particolare accento sulle trasformazioni tecnologiche in corso e sul rapporto fra la fotografia e le altre discipline espressive. Il Museo opera in un contesto nazionale e internazionale. Al tempo stesso è fortemente radicato nel territorio metropolitano in cui si trova, ponendosi in continuo dialogo con le comunità che vi abitano. Il patrimonio fotografico del Museo di Fotografia Contemporanea comprende oltre un milione e 800mila fotografie – stampe in bianco e nero e a colori, negativi, video, installazioni – di circa quattrocento autori italiani e stranieri. L’insieme costituisce uno spaccato significativo della fotografia dal secondo dopoguerra ad oggi. Nelle collezioni sono presenti temi importanti quali le trasformazioni del paesaggio contemporaneo, il ritratto, la fotografia sociale, la ricerca artistica. La Biblioteca del Museo di Fotografia Contemporanea comprende circa 15 mila volumi: monografie dei principali autori della fotografia storica e contemporanea internazionale, cataloghi di mostre personali e collettive, testi teorici e storici, collezioni di riviste italiane e straniere.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/virginia-historical-society.jpeg
Virginia Museum of History & Culture
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museo-nazionale-di-fotografia.jpeg
Museo Nazionale di Fotografia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Virginia Museum of History & Culture
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Museo Nazionale di Fotografia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Virginia Museum of History & Culture in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museo Nazionale di Fotografia in 2026.

Incident History — Virginia Museum of History & Culture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Virginia Museum of History & Culture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Museo Nazionale di Fotografia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museo Nazionale di Fotografia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/virginia-historical-society.jpeg
Virginia Museum of History & Culture
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museo-nazionale-di-fotografia.jpeg
Museo Nazionale di Fotografia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Virginia Museum of History & Culture company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museo Nazionale di Fotografia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Museo Nazionale di Fotografia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Virginia Museum of History & Culture company.

In the current year, Museo Nazionale di Fotografia company and Virginia Museum of History & Culture company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Museo Nazionale di Fotografia company nor Virginia Museum of History & Culture company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Museo Nazionale di Fotografia company nor Virginia Museum of History & Culture company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Museo Nazionale di Fotografia company nor Virginia Museum of History & Culture company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Virginia Museum of History & Culture company nor Museo Nazionale di Fotografia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Virginia Museum of History & Culture nor Museo Nazionale di Fotografia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Virginia Museum of History & Culture company nor Museo Nazionale di Fotografia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Virginia Museum of History & Culture company employs more people globally than Museo Nazionale di Fotografia company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Virginia Museum of History & Culture nor Museo Nazionale di Fotografia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Virginia Museum of History & Culture nor Museo Nazionale di Fotografia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Virginia Museum of History & Culture nor Museo Nazionale di Fotografia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Virginia Museum of History & Culture nor Museo Nazionale di Fotografia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Virginia Museum of History & Culture nor Museo Nazionale di Fotografia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Virginia Museum of History & Culture nor Museo Nazionale di Fotografia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N