Comparison Overview

Virgin Active

VS

Massage Envy

Virgin Active

26 Little Trinity Lane, London, undefined, EC4V2AR, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Virgin Active is a globally recognised exercise brand with over 230 clubs in 8 countries and more than 1.2 million members. As part of the Virgin Group founded by Sir Richard Branson, Virgin Active disrupted the UK fitness industry in 1999 by creating large health clubs offering an unprecedented number of world-class health and fitness products and services all under one roof. We now operate 38 clubs in the UK with an unparalleled collection of iconic locations in London and around the UK. A global industry leader for two decades, Virgin Active UK continues to innovate by developing a more personalised gym, multi-boutique experience and purpose to inspire people to live an active life. We’re always on the hunt for unique individuals with bucket loads of talent. If you’ve got what it takes or want to share an idea you think could be great, we’re all ears.

NAICS: 71394
NAICS Definition: Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees: 7,465
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Massage Envy

14350 N. 87th St., Suite 200, Scottsdale, AZ, 85260, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Massage Envy is the nation’s #1 provider of massage collectively across its franchise network and a national leader in skin care. All Massage Envy locations are independently owned and operated franchises, where the franchisee is the sole employer of all positions. Massage Envy combines big-brand recognition with a small-brand feel because at its heart is a caring, supportive community of dedicated wellness professionals who share one purpose: helping people feel and look better so they can live better. Making a difference in clients’ lives is the biggest reward for any wellness professional, but the environment at a Massage Envy franchised location can also offer you the freedom to enjoy more of what you love about your work. Come grow your career at a place that values, supports, and empowers you!

NAICS: 71394
NAICS Definition: Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees: 16,148
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/virgin-active.jpeg
Virgin Active
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massage-envy.jpeg
Massage Envy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Virgin Active
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Massage Envy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Virgin Active in 2025.

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Massage Envy in 2025.

Incident History — Virgin Active (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Virgin Active cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Massage Envy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Massage Envy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/virgin-active.jpeg
Virgin Active
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massage-envy.jpeg
Massage Envy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Massage Envy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Virgin Active company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Virgin Active company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Massage Envy company has not reported any.

In the current year, Massage Envy company and Virgin Active company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Massage Envy company nor Virgin Active company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Massage Envy company nor Virgin Active company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Virgin Active company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Massage Envy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Virgin Active company nor Massage Envy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Virgin Active nor Massage Envy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Virgin Active company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Massage Envy company.

Massage Envy company employs more people globally than Virgin Active company, reflecting its scale as a Wellness and Fitness Services.

Neither Virgin Active nor Massage Envy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Virgin Active nor Massage Envy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Virgin Active nor Massage Envy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Virgin Active nor Massage Envy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Virgin Active nor Massage Envy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Virgin Active nor Massage Envy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Community Dashboard Framework prior to versions 10.2.0.4, including 9.3.0.x and 8.3.x display the full server stack trace when encountering an error within the GetCdfResource servlet.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Community Dashboard Editor plugin versions before 10.2.0.4, including 9.3.0.x and 8.3.x, deserialize untrusted JSON data without constraining the parser to approved classes and methods.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in CTCMS Content Management System up to 2.1.2. The impacted element is an unknown function in the library /ctcms/libs/Ct_Config.php of the component Backend System Configuration Module. The manipulation of the argument Cj_Add/Cj_Edit results in code injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in CTCMS Content Management System up to 2.1.2. The affected element is the function Save of the file /ctcms/libs/Ct_App.php of the component Backend App Configuration Module. The manipulation of the argument CT_App_Paytype leads to code injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15, it was possible to accept an invitation opened by a different user. Version 5.15. contains a patch. As a workaround, avoid leaving one's Weblate sessions with an invitation opened unattended.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X