Comparison Overview

Viptela

VS

Controlled Networks

Viptela

1730 N 1st St., Suite 500, San Jose, CA, 95110, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://viptela.com

Viptela is a fast growing, private company that is disrupting network infrastructure technology that enterprises use to connect their facilities, users and applications. Featured in the Forbes, Wall Street Journal and leading trade-press journals, Viptela has emerged as a clear leader in the multi-billion Software-Defined WAN (SD-WAN) segment. Over 25 Fortune-500 companies deploy Viptela technology at thousands of sites on six continents, to drastically simplify their WAN infrastructure with over 50% cost-savings. Verizon and Singtel offer managed services, globally, based on Viptela's SD-WAN technology. Viptela’s secure, overlay WAN technology delivers to enterprises the benefit of: • Unified and centralized management of all WAN infrastructure • Reduced WAN infrastructure costs by over 50% • In-depth control & visibility of application performance • Robust-zero trust WAN security • Agility, by reducing network change control from months to days Viptela is backed by Sequoia Capital. A 3-minute video overview is here http://youtu.be/0iW-3tt4LH4

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Controlled Networks

undefined, Hackensack, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.controllednetworks.com

Founded in 1994, Controlled Networks is a privately held corporation with access to unlimited IT expertise and solutions. Our organization’s strength lies in our ability to attract top consultants from within the highest echelons of the IT community. This enables us the meet the business goals and objectives of our clients. Our clients are able to achieve their objective as a leader in their respective industries without having to worry about infrastructure issues or it problems. Technology focused. Quality driven.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/viptela.jpeg
Viptela
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/controlled-networks.jpeg
Controlled Networks
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Viptela
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Controlled Networks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Viptela in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Controlled Networks in 2025.

Incident History — Viptela (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Viptela cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Controlled Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Controlled Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/viptela.jpeg
Viptela
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/controlled-networks.jpeg
Controlled Networks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Controlled Networks company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Viptela company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Controlled Networks company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Viptela company.

In the current year, Controlled Networks company and Viptela company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Controlled Networks company nor Viptela company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Controlled Networks company nor Viptela company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Controlled Networks company nor Viptela company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Viptela company nor Controlled Networks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Viptela nor Controlled Networks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Viptela company nor Controlled Networks company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Viptela company employs more people globally than Controlled Networks company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Viptela nor Controlled Networks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Viptela nor Controlled Networks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Viptela nor Controlled Networks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Viptela nor Controlled Networks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Viptela nor Controlled Networks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Viptela nor Controlled Networks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References