Comparison Overview

VINCI

VS

Bechtel Corporation

VINCI

Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 800 and 849

VINCI is a world leader in concessions, energy and construction, employing 280.000 people in some 120 countries. We design, finance, build and operate infrastructure and facilities that help improve daily life and mobility for all. Because we believe in all-round performance, above and beyond economic results, we are committed to operating in an environmentally and socially responsible manner. You can be part of projects that bring lasting change to urban ecosystems and entire regions. Join the team!

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 13,465
Subsidiaries: 134
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Bechtel Corporation

undefined, Reston, Virginia, 20190, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 800 and 849

Bechtel is a trusted engineering, construction and project management partner to industry and government. Differentiated by the quality of our people and our relentless drive to deliver the most successful outcomes, we align our capabilities to our customers’ objectives to create a lasting positive impact. Since 1898, we have helped customers complete more than 25,000 projects in 160 countries on all seven continents that have created jobs, grown economies, improved the resiliency of the world's infrastructure, increased access to energy, resources, and vital services, and made the world a safer, cleaner place. Bechtel serves the Energy; Infrastructure; Manufacturing & Technology; Mining & Metals; and Nuclear, Security & Environmental markets. Our services span from initial planning and investment, through start-up and operations. Bechtel has received reports about individuals receiving fraudulent job confirmations and requests for interviews, offers, or solicitations for training via letters, emails, social postings, phone calls, instant messages (including Whatsapp) and texts. If you receive unsolicited job or interview offers or are unsure if the offer you received is fraudulent, contact Bechtel at [email protected]. Please forward the email, phone number, and any other documentation you received.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 25,856
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vinci.jpeg
VINCI
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bechtel-corporation.jpeg
Bechtel Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
VINCI
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bechtel Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VINCI in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bechtel Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — VINCI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VINCI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bechtel Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bechtel Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vinci.jpeg
VINCI
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: phishing, exploiting vulnerabilities, supply chain compromises, third-party breaches, cookie hijacking
Motivation: financial gain, operational disruption, geopolitical influence, strategic hybrid warfare
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bechtel-corporation.jpeg
Bechtel Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

VINCI company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bechtel Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

VINCI company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Bechtel Corporation company has not reported any.

In the current year, Bechtel Corporation company and VINCI company have not reported any cyber incidents.

VINCI company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Bechtel Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bechtel Corporation company nor VINCI company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bechtel Corporation company nor VINCI company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither VINCI company nor Bechtel Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither VINCI nor Bechtel Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

VINCI company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bechtel Corporation company.

Bechtel Corporation company employs more people globally than VINCI company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither VINCI nor Bechtel Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither VINCI nor Bechtel Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither VINCI nor Bechtel Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither VINCI nor Bechtel Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither VINCI nor Bechtel Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither VINCI nor Bechtel Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H