Comparison Overview

VINCI Energies

VS

SONDA

VINCI Energies

2169, Boulevard de la Défense, Nanterre, Île-de-France, 92000, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-22

In a world undergoing constant change, VINCI Energies contributes to the environmental transition by helping bring about major trends in the digital landscape and energy sector. VINCI Energies’ teams roll out technologies and integrate customised multi-technical solutions, from design to implementation, operation and maintenance. With their strong local roots and agile and innovative structure, VINCI Energies’ 2000 business units have positioned themselves at the heart of the energy choices of their customers, boosting the reliability, efficiency and sustainability of their infrastructure and processes. VINCI Energies strives for global performance, caring for the planet, useful to people and committed to local communities. 2023 : €19.3 billion // 97,000 employees // 2000 Business Units // 61 countries

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 23,499
Subsidiaries: 170
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

SONDA

Teatinos 500, Santiago, undefined, undefined, CL
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

We are at the forefront of digital transformation in the Americas, positively impacting the lives of over 500 million people. As a key player in emerging industries, we drive innovation and change through ambitious modernization projects and cutting-edge solutions. By understanding the region's challenges and demands, we provide a comprehensive portfolio of business solutions tailored to the primary industries, driving innovation and success in the market. We operate in 13 countries with a dedicated team of over 15,000 regional employees, earning the trust of more than 5,000 corporate clients to lead their digital transformation journeys. Our extensive presence spans Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Ecuador, the United States, Canada, Mexico, Panama, Peru, and Uruguay.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 14,367
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vinci-energies.jpeg
VINCI Energies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sonda.jpeg
SONDA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
VINCI Energies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SONDA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VINCI Energies in 2025.

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SONDA in 2025.

Incident History — VINCI Energies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VINCI Energies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SONDA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SONDA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vinci-energies.jpeg
VINCI Energies
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: phishing, exploiting vulnerabilities, supply chain compromises, third-party breaches, cookie hijacking
Motivation: financial gain, operational disruption, geopolitical influence, strategic hybrid warfare
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sonda.jpeg
SONDA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SONDA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to VINCI Energies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

VINCI Energies company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SONDA company has not reported any.

In the current year, SONDA company and VINCI Energies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

VINCI Energies company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while SONDA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither SONDA company nor VINCI Energies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SONDA company nor VINCI Energies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither VINCI Energies company nor SONDA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither VINCI Energies nor SONDA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

VINCI Energies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SONDA company.

VINCI Energies company employs more people globally than SONDA company, reflecting its scale as a Information Technology & Services.

Neither VINCI Energies nor SONDA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither VINCI Energies nor SONDA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither VINCI Energies nor SONDA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither VINCI Energies nor SONDA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither VINCI Energies nor SONDA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither VINCI Energies nor SONDA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H