Comparison Overview

Ville de Montréal

VS

Government of Alberta

Ville de Montréal

275, rue Notre Dame Est, Montréal, Québec, CA, H2Y 1C6
Last Update: 2026-01-24
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://montreal.ca/articles/offres-demploi-2944

Montréal est la plus grande ville francophone d’Amérique et elle se distingue par sa vitalité culturelle exceptionnelle et des forces créatrices reconnues mondialement. Elle se développe un peu plus chaque jour en une ville contemporaine, inclusive et dynamique sur les plans économique, culturel et social. Visant à offrir aux Montréalaises et aux Montréalais un lieu de vie agréable et prospère, la Ville de Montréal veut rester à l’écoute des besoins changeants de sa population afin de s’y adapter de façon continue. Pour ce faire, elle mise sur les compétences et l’expertise de ses 28 000 employés au service de 1,8 million de citoyens.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 11,950
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Government of Alberta

Public Service Commission, Edmonton, T5J 2N2, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.alberta.ca

Work with the Alberta government to build a stronger province for current and future generations. We offer diverse and rewarding employment opportunities in an environment that encourages continuous learning and career growth. We are one of the largest employers in Alberta with over 27,000 employees throughout the province. We are an award winning organization that values respect, accountability, integrity, and excellence. Our employees share a common vision of proudly working together to build a stronger province and make a positive and lasting difference in the lives of Albertans. The people of Alberta enjoy a very high quality of life, including the lowest overall taxes in Canada. www.jobs.alberta.ca Please see our comment policy: https://www.alberta.ca/social-media-comment-policy.aspx

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 19,649
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ville-de-montr-al.jpeg
Ville de Montréal
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/government-of-alberta.jpeg
Government of Alberta
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ville de Montréal
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Government of Alberta
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ville de Montréal in 2026.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Government of Alberta in 2026.

Incident History — Ville de Montréal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ville de Montréal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Government of Alberta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Government of Alberta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ville-de-montr-al.jpeg
Ville de Montréal
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/government-of-alberta.jpeg
Government of Alberta
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Government of Alberta company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ville de Montréal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Government of Alberta company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ville de Montréal company.

In the current year, Government of Alberta company and Ville de Montréal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Government of Alberta company nor Ville de Montréal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Government of Alberta company nor Ville de Montréal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Government of Alberta company nor Ville de Montréal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ville de Montréal company nor Government of Alberta company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ville de Montréal nor Government of Alberta holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Government of Alberta company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ville de Montréal company.

Government of Alberta company employs more people globally than Ville de Montréal company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Ville de Montréal nor Government of Alberta holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ville de Montréal nor Government of Alberta holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ville de Montréal nor Government of Alberta holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ville de Montréal nor Government of Alberta holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ville de Montréal nor Government of Alberta holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ville de Montréal nor Government of Alberta holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References