Comparison Overview

Village Voice

VS

CrunchMind

Village Voice

80 Maiden Lane, New York, 10038, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1955 by a small group led by Norman Mailer, the Village Voice is the nation's original alternative newsweekly. The winner of three Pulitzers, the paper built a reputation for itself as an aggressive interrogator of the powers that be as well as a reliable resource for finding and promoting cutting-edge arts and culture. Over the years it has been home to a wide range of writers and artists, including literary luminaries e.e. cummings, Katherine Anne Porter, Ezra Pound, and James Baldwin, photographer Sylvia Plachy, cartoonist Lynda Barry, investigative journalists Wayne Barrett and Tom Robbins, “Dean of American Rock Critics” Robert Christgau, and film authority J. Hoberman, among many others.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 185
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CrunchMind

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

CrunchMind is an online data driven publishing power house. Our great in house team of content writers and editors brainstorm content ideas day and night to engage our audience with the most relevant and interesting topics. We currently reach over 75M users a month across our network of owned and operated magazines. Powered by our proprietary data science algorithms we are able to personalize our content and user experienced to create the best online entertainment experience possible to our readers.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/village-voice-media.jpeg
Village Voice
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crunchmind.jpeg
CrunchMind
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Village Voice
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CrunchMind
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Village Voice in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CrunchMind in 2025.

Incident History — Village Voice (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Village Voice cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CrunchMind (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CrunchMind cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/village-voice-media.jpeg
Village Voice
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crunchmind.jpeg
CrunchMind
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Village Voice company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CrunchMind company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CrunchMind company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Village Voice company.

In the current year, CrunchMind company and Village Voice company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CrunchMind company nor Village Voice company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CrunchMind company nor Village Voice company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CrunchMind company nor Village Voice company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Village Voice company nor CrunchMind company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Village Voice nor CrunchMind holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Village Voice company nor CrunchMind company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Village Voice company employs more people globally than CrunchMind company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Village Voice nor CrunchMind holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Village Voice nor CrunchMind holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Village Voice nor CrunchMind holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Village Voice nor CrunchMind holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Village Voice nor CrunchMind holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Village Voice nor CrunchMind holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.